They kick ass mutha****erssss!!!!
What makes Latino fighters so great and dominant in boxing?
Collapse
-
-
Wtf is thatOnes that pay better, and don't leave you with brain damage.
Latinos have bad chins. Look at Cain Velasquez, Tito Ortiz, Tony Ferguson, Miguel Torres - great grapplers who got KO'd just touching gloves.
Look at Stipe Miocic, like Fury ,... he could be doing something else, but it comes so easy to him, and there's profit and pride in being Heavyweight champ, so he just shows up and cleans house.
Fury is bum who looks like Humpty Dumpty lolComment
-
Comment
-
boxing (especially in America) is usually taken up by urban, working class people who tend to be black or latino (its all socio-economics)
again a reason why Eastern Europeans tend to attracted to boxing (its all socio-economics not race)
but you seem like you don't understand thatComment
-
Comment
-
There are more Latino boxing fans who pay money for tickets and PPVs than most other demographics, so the promoters, the salesmen, push the product that will get the most people to buy. Whatever you think of their all time great status, or their P4P claims, the last 10 years saw an excellent crop of non-USA, non-Hispanic, non-UK... basically, non-big-$-demographic fighters. GGG, Lomachenko, Pacquiao, Kovalev.
Between these 4 excellent smaller demographic fighters, they had a total 6 fights at the pinnacle of the sport, and going into those fights had only 1 loss between them since the time Pacquiao fought Morales.
GGG vs Canelo twice.
Pacquiao vs Mayweather.
Kovalev vs Ward twice.
Lomachenko vs Lopez.
And with only 1 loss between them since Pacquiao-Morales going into this group of superfights, this crop of foreign fighters lost or drew ALL SIX. ALL SIX TIMES, lol. And Canelo vs Kovalev would make 7.
And all 6+ times, either the American or Hispanic, and either the bigger money-making fighter in the present or projected to be in the future, won the fight against the non-USA, non-Hispanic fighter.
Do you think that's just a coincidence? Do you think that's really just how it went down on talent alone? Or do you think maybe something else is really going on? Pacquiao looked old vs Floyd Mayweather. At that time, Pacquiao was trained by one of the most experienced trainers in the sport, Freddie Roach. Then he looked even older vs Jeff Horn. 3-4 years later, when he's 40 years old, he fires his real trainer, hires his childhood friend with zero training experience, and beats prime Keith Thurman. 40 year old Pacquiao, without a trainer, somehow looks better than 36 year old Pacquiao, with a pro trainer.
Why? Maybe because Pacquiao generates a lot more money than Thurman, but he generates a lot less money than Floyd? I don't know... it's just my opinion and my speculation... but search your feelings... something seems amiss....Last edited by Boxing Logic; 10-18-2020, 03:05 AM.Comment
-
Comment
-
Some pretty racist viewpoints in this thread yeeesssshhhh. Latin fighters are awesome however and excitingComment
-
White americans don't take up boxing because they don't have the economic pressures to have to, same as whites in western europe
hence why many of the top white fighters are eastern european (its not race, its all socio-economics)Comment
Comment