Andy Ruiz twice, Pulev, then Fury sounds pretty unreal to me
Oh? Ruiz was unranked when he beat AJ, and Pulev is absent from most top 10 lists. Had he not quit in his corner against Ruiz then those three fights would be considered terrible.
Pulev hasn't fought a decent opponent in four and a half years!
I bring Fury up as well as Wilder because it's relevant. They're two of the three top ranked heavyweights, and Pulev is a better opponent than most of the guys on their records. Again, just look at the abysmal opponents Wilder faced in voluntary defences lol
No, he can't. It's really simple; if AJ chose not to fight either of his mandatories in favour of facing Fury for undisputed (even though it was impossible) he would have been stripped of at least one of the titles, if not both. And then it wouldn't have been an undisputed fight. He has no leverage when two sanctioning bodies order their mandatories at the same time. He has to face one under the agreement that he faces the other one next.
AJ funds the sanctioning bodies. He has plenty of leverage. Hes there meal ticket and is literally paying to keep them a float.
I completely agree Wilder faced some crappy opponents. But that is irrelevant. So not sure why you need to bring that up.
Oh? Ruiz was unranked when he beat AJ, and Pulev is absent from most top 10 lists. Had he not quit in his corner against Ruiz then those three fights would be considered terrible.
Pulev hasn't fought a decent opponent in four and a half years!
Can you please explain how a champion is allowed to fight an unranked opponent ?
Pulev defeated Hughie Fury for the mandatory, Hughie would probably be Wilders second best win , third at the least .
Oh? Ruiz was unranked when he beat AJ, and Pulev is absent from most top 10 lists. Had he not quit in his corner against Ruiz then those three fights would be considered terrible.
Pulev hasn't fought a decent opponent in four and a half years!
Lmao so now Ruiz was a bad opponent. Smh you Wilder nutmunchers are too much.
Tweet
Comment