Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Sulaiman: Lomachenko Is The WBC Lightweight Champion

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by bluebeam View Post
    You dudes cant debate facts.

    So now its about race?

    Yea ok bro
    No, the fact is that you ignore what everyone else in the sport understands. Every expert and every single ranking system.

    Loma is the #1 LW in the world by every ranking system. It's not disputable based on your feelings.

    So, when you refuse to acknowledge it, there must be an underlying reason. You're just not giving the real reason.

    And remember, I didn't just name race as a factor. I named nationality as well.

    I guess that I should have just named ******ity as a 3rd option as well. Just to give you another option that may be closer to the truth.

    This is the end of our pointless conversation and I will be back here Sunday to rub it in when Loma embarrasses a fighter that people like you think will have a chance to beat him before the fight.

    Comment


    • Like we the sane boxing fans have been saying, this guy has the worst belt in boxing. They make up their s hit as they go along. Until the winner fights Haney it wouldn’t be undisputed in my eye or the record books.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by bluebeam View Post
        Everything i said in my post were facts.


        And you still act like a fanboy.

        Call a spade a spade.

        You talking about name who he could have fought. Im telling you who he did fight. And i listed his whole resume.

        And its far from special. Thats a fact.

        Who the **** is chonlatarn Piriyapinyo?

        Who the **** is romulo koasicha?
        Are you too ****** to see you deflecting?

        What youre doing is pointing out facts but facts are USELESS without CONTEXT .

        But people like you don't care for context do you? I asked who else Lomachenko could have fought and again you refuse to answer instead trying to deflect.

        Who are those guys? One guy was a mandatory to Lomas 126 title and the other guy was ranked #7 at the time.

        Now it's your turn big boy who thinks you dont deflect. Who was available and the best at the time Loma was there? I can't wait for you not to answer you ****ing hater

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Boxing Goat View Post
          No, the fact is that you ignore what everyone else in the sport understands. Every expert and every single ranking system.

          Loma is the #1 LW in the world by every ranking system. It's not disputable based on your feelings.

          So, when you refuse to acknowledge it, there must be an underlying reason. You're just not giving the real reason.

          And remember, I didn't just name race as a factor. I named nationality as well.

          I guess that I should have just named ******ity as a 3rd option as well. Just to give you another option that may be closer to the truth.

          This is the end of our pointless conversation and I will be back here Sunday to rub it in when Loma embarrasses a fighter that people like you think will have a chance to beat him before the fight.


          When did i ever say loma wasnt number 1 at 135? Please show me. I didnt. You keep making **** up to try to paint me as a loma hater. Stick to facts.

          And you cant rub a win over teofimo in my face because everybody expects loma to win that fight. Including me.

          I like haney over loma. not teofimo. Not tank. Not king Ry

          The guy who loma didnt fight

          And nationality. Nobody cares if loma was from texas or brazil. His resume doesnt change. Its decent. Its not special.
          Last edited by bluebeam; 10-14-2020, 03:47 PM.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by R-Hand Southpaw View Post
            Are you too ****** to see you deflecting?

            What youre doing is pointing out facts but facts are USELESS without CONTEXT .

            But people like you don't care for context do you? I asked who else Lomachenko could have fought and again you refuse to answer instead trying to deflect.

            Who are those guys? One guy was a mandatory to Lomas 126 title and the other guy was ranked #7 at the time.

            Now it's your turn big boy who thinks you dont deflect. Who was available and the best at the time Loma was there? I can't wait for you not to answer you ****ing hater

            Ranked number 7. But nobody ever heard of him before or after the loma fight including you. And the other guy was a mandatory right?

            It just proves my point again about rankings being bull**** . and you're ok with loma fighting a mandatory nobody ever heard of. But when haney is mandatory. He doesnt deserve it. Loma shouldnt fight him. You are a ****ing hypocrite.

            Now to answer your question about 126 and 130. There was miguel berchelt just to name 1. Oscar valdez just to name 2. Both fight under the same banner. No promotional politics since they are all top rank. Those are far better options than marriaga and martinez right?

            Or how about frampton, Santa cruz, mares, salido rematch.


            But no. Instead we got sosa, marriaga and the number 7 ranked guy you or nobody else ever heard of.

            Again. All facts
            Last edited by bluebeam; 10-14-2020, 03:59 PM.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by bluebeam View Post
              When did i ever say loma wasnt number 1 at 135? Please show me. I didnt. You keep making **** up to try to paint me as a loma hater. Stick to facts.

              And you cant rub a win over teofimo in my face because everybody expects loma to win that fight. Including me.

              I like haney over loma. not teofimo. Not tank. Not king Ry

              The guy who loma didnt fight

              And nationality. Nobody cares if loma was from texas or brazil. His resume doesnt change. Its decent. Its not special.
              Delusional

              Comment


              • Originally posted by skylanding818
                good luck.
                Good luck with what, exactly?

                Comment


                • Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post
                  Well, you can't really disagree with the factual part of how Haney was Lomachenko's mandatory and then Top Rank chose to drop the belt by asking for Franchise Champion status.

                  But maybe I'm wrong about Lomachenko dropping down to 130 after Saturday. Maybe he will fight Haney next.
                  Only time will tell my friend

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by paulf View Post
                    As ****** as it is, Haney and Charlo are the champs. You can't strip a guy of his title to allow his promoters to not have to do business with one another, give it to another fighter, and then say the original guy is undisputed. That is comical.

                    Haney and Charlo are the champs, not Loma and Canelo, because the WBC is a garbage organization. Period.
                    But that’s how it works with the WBA

                    The whole reason behind the WBA Super is to avoid mandatories (and extra sanctioning fees)

                    Comment


                    • So this is fairly significant

                      Now it’s up in the air, as to what the true WBC title is

                      Looks as if ESPN are recognising the Franchise. I’m sure some others will follow suit

                      Genuinely interested to see what the other ABC’s start to do in terms of recognition

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP