Lomachenko is another HBO hypejob (Krusher, GGG, Gonzalez)

[QueensburyRules]

The only legit fight Floyd didn't take was due to a business situation & that was Margarito. And if he'd have taken that fight & won he'd never have gotten the big fights that boosted his name cuz he woulda had to forgo a buyout option with TR at a key time.

- -U Ellerbee wannabe house boy?

[bluebeam]

Lomachenko made four guys QUIT in a row. Not even Sugar Ray Leonard could manage it.

Lomachenko beat Rigondeaux who even Floyd considered #1 P4P at the time. Made him quit on the stool.

Nick Walters was widely expected to KO Loma. Made to quit so bad he was in a hurry to run across the ring and hug him for making him quit.


Now, you can dismiss the wins all you care to. Doesn't change the fact that even Walters alone craps all over Lopez's resume.

Walters has 1 notable win in his career and thats a blown up nonito.

Walters didn't beat anybody before or after donaire. So cut it out acting like walters was some top champion. He went into the loma fight coming off of a 1 year layoff and a draw.

Rigo jumped 2 weight classes to fight vasyl.

You cant credit loma for beating rigo if floyd dont get credit for marquez and errol dont get credit for mikey.

Dont be a hypocrite.

[bluebeam]

Was Broner #1 in any division? If he was I'm sure he wasn't #1 in two. Titles mean nothing today. Or maybe not nothing, but all they mean to me for sure is that you are a top ten guy. I wouldn't call a guy who's won 4 belts, but was only #1 in 1 division among the best of his era.

As to Loma being among the best of his era, show me all the guys 32yrs & under who've been #1 in 3 divisions? It's not a long list is it?

You keep saying loma was number 1 in 3 divisons when he only unified in 1 divison and thats the one he's in now. So stop saying he was number 1 in 3 divisions like its facts. Thats just your opinion.

It was 4 champions at 126 when he was there. Not to mentiom the man who beat him. It was 4 champions at 130 while he was there.

4 champions in a divison means no number 1

For example

Who is number 1 at 168? Its 4 champs
Who is number 1 at 130? Its 4 champs

No way to say. Its only opinion.

[BoxingIsGreat]

You keep saying loma was number 1 in 3 divisons when he only unified in 1 divison and thats the one he's in now. So stop saying he was number 1 in 3 divisions like its facts. Thats just your opinion.

It was 4 champions at 126 when he was there. Not to mentiom the man who beat him. It was 4 champions at 130 while he was there.

4 champions in a divison means no number 1

For example

Who is number 1 at 168? Its 4 champs
Who is number 1 at 130? Its 4 champs

No way to say. Its only opinion.

That's why I don't follow belts. I see what I see.

[Divine Hammer]

Walters has 1 notable win in his career and thats a blown up nonito.

Walters didn't beat anybody before or after donaire. So cut it out acting like walters was some top champion. He went into the loma fight coming off of a 1 year layoff and a draw.

Rigo jumped 2 weight classes to fight vasyl.

You cant credit loma for beating rigo if floyd dont get credit for marquez and errol dont get credit for mikey.

Dont be a hypocrite.

walters dominated and brutally KO'ed donaire in 6 rounds which is something a supposedly stronger top 5 p4p inoue couldn't do to a much older faded and drained donaire.

rigo still very dangerous and skillful and lomachenko used his skills to dominate and make him miss EVERY shot. same outcome at 126 where they were supposed to fight at.

marquez was former 126 champ moving all the way up to 147. without proper steroids from heredia. he had no chance. and mikey also former 126 champ. whereas rigo was current 122 champ at the time fighting at 130. less weight jumps.

this is all easy to understand unless u have a pea brain.

[bluebeam]

walters dominated and brutally KO'ed donaire in 6 rounds which is something a supposedly stronger top 5 p4p inoue couldn't do to a much older faded and drained donaire.

rigo still very dangerous and skillful and lomachenko used his skills to dominate and make him miss EVERY shot. same outcome at 126 where they were supposed to fight at.

marquez was former 126 champ moving all the way up to 147. without proper steroids from heredia. he had no chance. and mikey also former 126 champ. whereas rigo was current 122 champ at the time fighting at 130. less weight jumps.

this is all easy to understand unless u have a pea brain.

You just proved my point. You are a hypocrite.

You say marquez and mikey came from 126

But you dont mention that nonito came from 112 and was in his 4th weight class in the walters fight. But you praise the walters victory over him. Nonito never fought at 126 again. And said out his own mouth. He had no business at that weight. Even dropped down 2 divisions to 118 where he felt he belonged.

Meanwhile Marquez went on to win the fight of his legacy at 147. And mikey is still campaigning at 147 right now.

Hypocrisy at its best.

Again. These are facts. Not opinions

[Eff Pandas]

You keep saying loma was number 1 in 3 divisons when he only unified in 1 divison and thats the one he's in now. So stop saying he was number 1 in 3 divisions like its facts. Thats just your opinion.

It was 4 champions at 126 when he was there. Not to mentiom the man who beat him. It was 4 champions at 130 while he was there.

4 champions in a divison means no number 1

For example

Who is number 1 at 168? Its 4 champs
Who is number 1 at 130? Its 4 champs

No way to say. Its only opinion.

That's the consensus opinion if you wanna take issue with it being a fact.

And I do get that a lot of hardcores love the unified or undisputed title holder angle, but to me all the titles hold less meaning then they ever have so I don't get THAT excited about it. All beating another title holder for sure means is you beat a top ten guy. And I think most would agree with that stance so what value does unified reallllllly have if we agree on that.

[MUNG]

what a shock, people don't like the 3 of em, ggg, kov and loma, wtf

[Rick Taylor]

Who did either avoid?

I'd argue no one. If anyone got avoided it was business or about other side of the street complications. And that's all one can do & if you are #1 in every division while doing that they are a bad mfer.

mayweather should have fought calzaghe but he was to scared.

and when hopkins called him out he went silent.

[bluebeam]

That's the consensus opinion if you wanna take issue with it being a fact.

And I do get that a lot of hardcores love the unified or undisputed title holder angle, but to me all the titles hold less meaning then they ever have so I don't get THAT excited about it. All beating another title holder for sure means is you beat a top ten guy. And I think most would agree with that stance so what value does unified reallllllly have if we agree on that.

Consensus opinion doesnt equal truth