Serious question. Why do PBC PPVs give better fights than Top Rank free ones?

[Combat Talk Radio]

Just asking because, you know, certain people said that Charlo / Derevyanchenko wasn't worth paying for. So

[SA96]

This is one of the best PPVs ever.

[Combat Talk Radio]

This is one of the best PPVs ever.

But others around here said it wouldn't be.

[boxcityusa805]

These fights are standard showtime championship boxing. Not ppv. If this was taking place in Las Vegas it wouldn’t sell out a small venue like mandalas bay let alone tmobile

[Dallas' 4 Eva]

This is one of the best PPVs ever.

This is a good PPV, definitely worth the money, but slow your roll now.

[Boxing-1013]

Not worth $75. Hardly any PPV is

[Robbie Barrett]

A good fight doesn't = a PPV worthy fight.

[Combat Talk Radio]

Not worth $75. Hardly any PPV is

But what made it not worth $75?

Ignore the fact that you know DAZN exists.

Ignore the fact that there's a pandemic.

Given the above, what made it not worth $75?

[JERMELL_CHARLO_]

Just asking because, you know, certain people said that Charlo / Derevyanchenko wasn't worth paying for. So

Fraud Arum outta touch like Vince McMahon

[-Kev-]

The PPV wasn’t worth $75 before the event or after, and I like PBC.

To be PPV you have to prove that you are must watch TV and have a good dance partner. These fights by the Charlo’s gets them a little closer to that but they still need a good A/B-side.

Both Charlo’s right now are about as good as B-sides. Almost. I could see something like Canelo vs Charlo doing okay PPV numbers solely because of Canelo.

Charlo‘s are just not must watch TV. They’re good though. And I hope this PPV sold at least 250k legit, no false reporting.