Comments Thread For: Jermall Charlo Decisions Sergiy Derevyanchenko in Action Battle

[koolkc107]

Where's yours?

Where's mine?

WTF do you call that bullshyt you just posted?

You do know what "paragraph" means, right?

I want you to describe what, when, where, how.

I want "at 2:45 in Sergiy lands x" or "1:37 Charlo scores with upper cut" or "clearly wobbled at the end of the round"

I want notes backed by boxing scoring criteria, not some fuquewad awarding rounds because even tho it should be 3 rounds to 1, scoring it 2 rounds to 2 "feels right".

In case you haven't figured it out by now, "feels right" just might be bias, so Imma need more than that, boss.

And follow instructions and start a thread.

I don't want this buried all these pages back. That's why I suggested that.

You wanna show everyone how smart you are?

Here's your chance.

[koolkc107]

An intelligent man, a real man, would never have that as their avatar. That's for little boys and wannabes. You expose yourself.

Hell, I log on via my pcs so infrequently I forgot that thing was still there.

I think that went up the day after the second fight when Golovkin and Abel got the Mexican style fight they'd been crying months for and seemed oddly and completely unprepared for it.

Hence, the crying Jordan GGG.

And he should have been crying. Golovkin could not have asked for a better scenario yet was turned into someone fighting off the back foot. You thinking he won that fight is hilarious and is a good reason to keep the avatar up actually...

[_Maxi]

The two of you are why I always vote yes when it comes to higher taxes for education.

The only thing exposed here is that you two have serious reading comprehension problems. That, and the fact that simple logic escapes you both.

You have to either be an idiot, biased, or some combination of the two to have scored Saturday nights fight for Derevyanchanko or a draw.

Charlo clearly won, and he did so much easier than both Jacobs and Golovkin. Charlo won no less than 8 rounds from Derevyanchanko, and that's being generous to Sergiy, who was rocked and battered.

It wasn’t close, so asking me what my score was in a fight that WAS CLOSE and then claiming some kind of point was made when I confirmed a close score is JUVENILE thinking.

But, judging by the reaction you're getting from other posters here, you probably didn't need me to tell you that.

Stay in your lane.

Or better yet, don't reply to my posts if you can't do better. I'm here less and less because of cretins like yourself and the time I am here I'd like to spend constructively.

Thank you for your cooperation.

GGG vs Canelo I was a clear GGG win.

You exposed yourself as a fanboi

[Boxing-1013]

Where's mine?

WTF do you call that bullshyt you just posted?

You do know what "paragraph" means, right?

I want you to describe what, when, where, how.

I want "at 2:45 in Sergiy lands x" or "1:37 Charlo scores with upper cut" or "clearly wobbled at the end of the round"

I want notes backed by boxing scoring criteria, not some fuquewad awarding rounds because even tho it should be 3 rounds to 1, scoring it 2 rounds to 2 "feels right".

In case you haven't figured it out by now, "feels right" just might be bias, so Imma need more than that, boss.

And follow instructions and start a thread.

I don't want this buried all these pages back. That's why I suggested that.

You wanna show everyone how smart you are?

Here's your chance.

Hell, I log on via my pcs so infrequently I forgot that thing was still there.

I think that went up the day after the second fight when Golovkin and Abel got the Mexican style fight they'd been crying months for and seemed oddly and completely unprepared for it.

Hence, the crying Jordan GGG.

And he should have been crying. Golovkin could not have asked for a better scenario yet was turned into someone fighting off the back foot. You thinking he won that fight is hilarious and is a good reason to keep the avatar up actually...

I mean most neutral people saw GGG win both fights. Teddy Atlas scored it 8-3-1 in fight 2, not much different than my card of 8-4. Canelo is a really good fighter but he isn't active enough to beat GGG, not yet anyway. GGG just outworks him. Pretty simple and easy fights to score for anyone without an agenda.

Canelo fought really well in fight 2, in both fights actually. He still lost both though. As much as people give credit to Canelo for holding the center of the ring vs GGG in fight 2, they should give props to GGG for fighting very well in such an environment and still outboxing Canelo, as it showed more depth to his game that we didn't know was there.

Why are you trying to weasel out of posting that as your avatar? 'Oh I forgot it was even on there' What a clown dude lol.

Why are you lying about what I said when it is right there in black and white? I said it could be 3-1, not that it should be, and that 2-2 feels right. Meaning I could see how someone nicked a couple close (but in their opinion clear) rounds to Charlo, but based on the overall flow of the fight, it felt very even and more like a 50-50 fight than a 75-25 fight. I shouldn't have to explain that to anyone. That should be obvious man. Say less.

I posted my scorecard and analysis. This isn't a college dissertation and quite frankly I don't give a sh.it to go more in-depth with my analysis. I watched the fight, I scored it. That's my opinion on it.

If you have an opinion on the fight, you should post yours. Otherwise you should just stfu.

[Boxing-1013]

GGG vs Canelo I was a clear GGG win.

You exposed yourself as a fanboi

He really is tying himself into some knots

[Elastic Recoilz]

I got my $40

Now his brother needs to get me the other $40 worth of a fight

At least you're getting a fraction of the life savings you blew on a bet back. Well played, keep the momentum and you might get it all back.

[Shadoww702]

At least you're getting a fraction of the life savings you blew on a bet back. Well played, keep the momentum and you might get it all back.

Huhhh! I take it you didn't see it live.

[Damn Wicked]

Great fight by both men. It was a very highly entertaining and exciting fight. Charlo is the real deal. He can not only punch but also can take a punch. I had him winning 115-113.

Also, Derevyanchenko put on a very valiant effort but I thought he was a bit too tentative in the early rounds. In other words, he started too late.

In either case, it was an amazing fight as I tip my hat to both fighters. Great effort guys!

It was a good, entertaining fight. I agree with you. Props to two warriors!

[Shadoww702]

I mean most neutral people saw GGG win both fights. Teddy Atlas scored it 8-3-1 in fight 2, not much different than my card of 8-4. Canelo is a really good fighter but he isn't active enough to beat GGG, not yet anyway. GGG just outworks him. Pretty simple and easy fights to score for anyone without an agenda.

Canelo fought really well in fight 2, in both fights actually. He still lost both though. As much as people give credit to Canelo for holding the center of the ring vs GGG in fight 2, they should give props to GGG for fighting very well in such an environment and still outboxing Canelo, as it showed more depth to his game that we didn't know was there.

Why are you trying to weasel out of posting that as your avatar? 'Oh I forgot it was even on there' What a clown dude lol.

Why are you lying about what I said when it is right there in black and white? I said it could be 3-1, not that it should be, and that 2-2 feels right. Meaning I could see how someone nicked a couple close (but in their opinion clear) rounds to Charlo, but based on the overall flow of the fight, it felt very even and more like a 50-50 fight than a 75-25 fight. I shouldn't have to explain that to anyone. That should be obvious man. Say less.

I posted my scorecard and analysis. This isn't a college dissertation and quite frankly I don't give a sh.it to go more in-depth with my analysis. I watched the fight, I scored it. That's my opinion on it.

If you have an opinion on the fight, you should post yours. Otherwise you should just stfu.

So you gave GGG at least 16 rounds against both Canelo fights. Why not just give him all 24 Byrd Jr ?

*** if you gave Canelo any rounds he he must of done really good.

I notice you gave EVERY close round to ggg.

End of the day your p@ssy still salty.

Haha must really hurt to know your opinion doesn't mean SHT.


But PLEASE do CRY more. Who knows maybe enough tears might change that loss to a win...

[Shadoww702]

Yeah you're really objective and neutral. Says the guy with a clown avatar, clearly propping up Canelo and hating on GGG.

You thinking that you're smarter than me, that's hilarious. But if you continue any conversation with me you'll quickly come to realize how out of your depth you are. I'll remember those words every time I see you post on here though.

Why tf would I care if you come around here or not? Lol there are a lot of dumb posters on here, and you are quite clearly one of them. You fit right in.

Why don't you post your card from last night then and those 8 CLEAR rounds Charlo won. To believe that, you have to be living in a fantasy.

Canelo had no way to getting to 6 rounds in either GGG fight. He won one and got a draw in one because he is the super A side in boxing and he wouldn't bring in all the revenue if he has a lot of losses, so he gets every close fight he can. It's common sense, a genius like you should understand that.

Nice self-owns though, I love it. The guy who says that Canelo really got a draw and a win over GGG is trying to lecture others about how to score fights!!!!! lolololol that sh.it really is hilarious. I sincerely thank you for that.

Saying that either Canelo-GGG fight was closer than the fight last night, I mean lol. You are on your own planet man.

Post your cards for those fights, preferably with some analysis for why you picked each guy for the round they won, or stfu.

You don't even score fights consistently!! This @ss clown is the WORST at judging fights. He looks up compubox and thats his winner.


Fkn CRYBABY!!!!