See, this kinda crap is why I don't post here much anymore.
Fanboys, not real boxing fans.
Anyone who had Derevyanchanko winning or had a draw either doesn't know how to score a fight or has an agenda that has little or nothing to do with the fight.
I'll make it easy for even you biased folk to understand how bad you look.
We can all agree (I hope) that Derevyanchanko fought both Jacobs and Golovkin tougher than he did Charlo.
Sergiy hit the canvas in both fights, yet on six possible judge's cards between the two fights, the tally was 115-112 for the winner on four of them. That's two of three judges in both of Sergiy's previous losses seeing 7 rounds to 5 rounds for Jacobs and GGG respectively.
Well, if they beat Derevyanchanko 7-5, Charlo beat Sergiy AT LEAST 8 rounds to 4 (with 9 to 3 perfectly understandable).
Some of you just don't want to admit what your eyes are telling you.
Charlo is actually good. And the case can made for him being the best in the division.
Canelo is going to have to come see him.
Fanboys, not real boxing fans.
Anyone who had Derevyanchanko winning or had a draw either doesn't know how to score a fight or has an agenda that has little or nothing to do with the fight.
I'll make it easy for even you biased folk to understand how bad you look.
We can all agree (I hope) that Derevyanchanko fought both Jacobs and Golovkin tougher than he did Charlo.
Sergiy hit the canvas in both fights, yet on six possible judge's cards between the two fights, the tally was 115-112 for the winner on four of them. That's two of three judges in both of Sergiy's previous losses seeing 7 rounds to 5 rounds for Jacobs and GGG respectively.
Well, if they beat Derevyanchanko 7-5, Charlo beat Sergiy AT LEAST 8 rounds to 4 (with 9 to 3 perfectly understandable).
Some of you just don't want to admit what your eyes are telling you.
Charlo is actually good. And the case can made for him being the best in the division.
Canelo is going to have to come see him.
Comment