Comments Thread For: Jermall Charlo Decisions Sergiy Derevyanchenko in Action Battle

[Boxing-1013]

See, this kinda crap is why I don't post here much anymore.

Fanboys, not real boxing fans.

Anyone who had Derevyanchanko winning or had a draw either doesn't know how to score a fight or has an agenda that has little or nothing to do with the fight.

I'll make it easy for even you biased folk to understand how bad you look.

We can all agree (I hope) that Derevyanchanko fought both Jacobs and Golovkin tougher than he did Charlo.

Sergiy hit the canvas in both fights, yet on six possible judge's cards between the two fights, the tally was 115-112 for the winner on four of them. That's two of three judges in both of Sergiy's previous losses seeing 7 rounds to 5 rounds for Jacobs and GGG respectively.

Well, if they beat Derevyanchanko 7-5, Charlo beat Sergiy AT LEAST 8 rounds to 4 (with 9 to 3 perfectly understandable).

Some of you just don't want to admit what your eyes are telling you.

Charlo is actually good. And the case can made for him being the best in the division.

Canelo is going to have to come see him.

Why do you prop up bad, pre-filled out cards as an example of success? lol. Anyone saying Charlo dominated that fight has NO CLUE what they are watching. People need to watch fights objectively and without sound. Really helps to score them.

What was your card btw? I've posted mine on here, with analysis.

[Boxing-1013]

I was going to post something similar but this is perfect.

There are a lot of idiots here that don't want to admit they got it wrong. They make themselves look even more ****** by scoring a clear loss for Derevyanchanko as a win or draw. No credible boxing fan will take that seriously.

Anyone who says Charlo dominated this fight, I mean they have no idea what they are watching. Watch the 1st, 6th, 10th,11th and 12th rounds, without sound, and try and make a claim that Charlo won those rounds. It's a joke.

Charlo fought well and showed some good stuff but idk why people feel compelled to give some guys every round that they land a decent punch in etc. People just have no idea what they are doing when they score fights. It's all emotion.

[Boxing-1013]

This is what gets me. - discussion starts out decent enough; one poster asking another to show their scoring in order to discuss...When the poster complies and reveals his scoring, no healthy discussion ensues, only name calling and trash talking from the one who requested said scorecard.

Are we not allowed to disagree in a public forum (in a friendly fashion) ?
Why even ask the guy for his scorecard, if we're not going to specifically address any details there of ?
What's the sense in having any discussion, if a different perspective causes me to be so negative and abased ?

Let's try talking about the fight details and not our personal opinion of an anonymous human that we truly do not know....

Peace.

Sorry man. I don't get it. Really "just the facts" is quite an ironic label to choose, for someone who refuses to be neutral or objective. Words like garbage, insane, ignorant, are very subjective and being used out of context.

Why even discuss, if a disagreement cannot result in casual discussion ? If everyone had the exact same perspective...well there wouldn't be much of a discussion.
This, "I'm right and you're wrong and you're ******, if you can't see why I'm right" stuff, is immature and often emotional...

We should be open to see why others have different views...
How you got Teofimo faring? You like his confidence ?
What about Haney? or Garcia ? You think Luke Campbell is finished ?
Can't recall if you follow lighter weights, but LW's are gettin some hype...

Thanks bro, you're one of the best posters on here. Great words from you.

If I'm a Loma fan, Teo worries me. He has the size and power to hurt Loma and make it his fight. Loma at 135 looks human; at 130 he looked unbeatable. If Loma wins, I will be very impressed (as I already am with him). I think in many ways this is his toughest fight for sure. Part of me still sees it going the same way as his fight with Walters however...I think Teo and his style may fit perfectly with what Loma likes to do...definitely looking forward to that one.

How do you see it?

Haney is a problem for anyone. I don't follow too many other of the guys at that weight though. Aren't quite a few of them mixing it up soon?

[joseph5620]

Anyone who says Charlo dominated this fight, I mean they have no idea what they are watching. Watch the 1st, 6th, 10th,11th and 12th rounds, without sound, and try and make a claim that Charlo won those rounds. It's a joke.

Charlo fought well and showed some good stuff but idk why people feel compelled to give some guys every round that they land a decent punch in etc. People just have no idea what they are doing when they score fights. It's all emotion.

Sorry but you have no credibility if you don't think Charlo clearly won the fight. I'm not even going to waste time reading reading your entire post. I can't take you seriously.

[Boxing-1013]

Sorry but you have no credibility if you don't think Charlo clearly won the fight. I'm not even going to waste time reading reading your entire post. I can't take you seriously.

Watch the 1st, 6th 10th 11th and 12th without sound and call it for the better man. People saying Charlo dominated is one of the most bizarre storylines I can recall on here tbh.

[joseph5620]

Watch the 1st, 6th 10th 11th and 12th without sound and call it for the better man. People saying Charlo dominated is one of the most bizarre storylines I can recall on here tbh.

I've already watched the fight so you don't have to keep repeating what rounds I should watch. It's not going to change what I saw.

Nobody said anything about"dominating." Stop putting words in people's mouths. Charlo clearly won and it wasn't questionable. That's all that matters.

[Boxing-1013]

I've already watched the fight so youndon't have to keep repeating what rounds I should watch. It's not going to change what I saw.

Nobody said anything about"dominating." Stop putting words in people's mouths. Charlo clearly won and it wasn't questionable. That's all that matters.

People should watch without sound. Feel like many get swayed, especially when the announcers are telling them what they want to hear. And yes many are saying dominating etc. He did not clearly win. Not to anyone objective and who knows how to score a fight.

[joseph5620]

People should watch without sound. Feel like many get swayed, especially when the announcers are telling them what they want to hear. And yes many are saying dominating etc. He did not clearly win. Not to anyone objective and who knows how to score a fight.

I've been watching boxing for years and have never been influenced by anything other than my own opinion. I really don't care what the announcers have to say. So no. That doesn't apply to me.


Charlo clearly won the fight, it wasn't difficult to score, and you're delusional. I can't take you seriously at all. You saw what you wanted to see. Unfortunately for you it's not reality.

[Boxing-1013]

I've been watching boxing for years and have never been influenced by anything other than my own opinion. I really don't care what the announcers have to say. So no. That doesn't apply to me.


Charlo clearly won the fight, it wasn't difficult to score, and you're delusional. I can't take you seriously at all. You saw what you wanted to see. Unfortunately for you it's not reality.

Lol not at all. Sounds like you're projecting. Either way I saw what I needed to see last night - that Charlo can compete with anyone at 160. That's all I really wanted to know.

But people need to learn how to score fights...what's the point in 2 guys lacing them up if people have their cards filled out beforehand.

Some just have no idea what they are scoring/some are easily influenced by announcers/and some have their cards filled out beforehand. Some are a mix or have all 3.

[CauliflowerEars]

Lol not at all. Sounds like you're projecting. Either way I saw what I needed to see last night - that Charlo can compete with anyone at 160. That's all I really wanted to know.

But people need to learn how to score fights...what's the point in 2 guys lacing them up if people have their cards filled out beforehand.

Some just have no idea what they are scoring/some are easily influenced by announcers/and some have their cards filled out beforehand. Some are a mix or have all 3.

I'll tell ya another thing I have to guard against being an influence, and that's a fighter's face.
I read somewhere that Dervy's skin and scars will never do him any favors in the ring. He's generally going to look like the beat fighter no matter what...