The only problem with your argument is that...well its totally wrong.
I dont love Floyd or think hes the greatest ever or anything like that.
hes a good, smart, exiting fighter who Ive watched and enjoyed watching for a long time.
Yeah, im a fan.
So what?
Yea, you still couldnt' beat my argument. Good try though...I like the "I'm just a fan" tactic. *Stamps "SUCKER" on PBF34 forehead*
Yea, you still couldnt' beat my argument. Good try though...I like the "I'm just a fan" tactic. *Stamps "SUCKER" on PBF34 forehead*
Go to sleep son...YOU LOSE!
What exactly is your argument.
If you phrased it in an intellegent manner, I may have been able to decipher, but instead it just looked like a teenager who had his feelings hurt by a fighter.
Realy?? look at Hattons last three opponents who they were, what they had just accomplished, then look at Floyds...p4p baby
waiting..
Muassa Collazo and Tszyu????
Zoo-I think he was a little washed up, but that doesnt matter. It was an excellent win.
Maussa is a champion, but has no talent. He sucks.
Collazo is a solid, crafty opponent.
Judah Mitchell Gatti
Gatti-The powerful, always dangerous Gatti. Floyd totally outclassed him and made him look like an amatuer.
Mitchell- A decent opponent, definitly past his prime, but a good warmup for the then undisputed champ at 147.
Judah-yes, coming off the baldomir loss, but he came in focused and in shape. Zab got off to an excellent start, but Floyd made the necessary adjustments and dominated the rest of the fight.
What exactly is your argument.
If you phrased it in an intellegent manner, I may have been able to decipher, but instead it just looked like a teenager who had his feelings hurt by a fighter.
Still no retort to my argument. WOW! You really dont get it do you? Try reading it again slowly. Maybe have your grandma help read it with you and she might be able to help you uncover my underlying theme or thesis. You do know what those words me correct? Ok son. *Stamps "Mental Midget" on PBF34's forhead*
Muassa Collazo and Tszyu????
Zoo-I think he was a little washed up, but that doesnt matter. It was an excellent win.
Maussa is a champion, but has no talent. He sucks.
Collazo is a solid, crafty opponent.
Judah Mitchell Gatti
Gatti-The powerful, always dangerous Gatti. Floyd totally outclassed him and made him look like an amatuer.
Mitchell- A decent opponent, definitly past his prime, but a good warmup for the then undisputed champ at 147.
Judah-yes, coming off the baldomir loss, but he came in focused and in shape. Zab got off to an excellent start, but Floyd made the necessary adjustments and dominated the rest of the fight.
You might be just a biiiiiit biased in the description of each of their previous 3 opponents dont you think genius! lmao.
Still no retort to my argument. WOW! You really dont get it do you? Try reading it again slowly. Maybe have your grandma help read it with you and she might be able to help you uncover my underlying theme or thesis. You do know what those words me correct? Ok son. *Stamps "Mental Midget" on PBF34's forhead*
Muassa Collazo and Tszyu????
Zoo-I think he was a little washed up, but that doesnt matter. It was an excellent win.
Maussa is a champion, but has no talent. He sucks.
Collazo is a solid, crafty opponent.
Judah Mitchell Gatti
Gatti-The powerful, always dangerous Gatti. Floyd totally outclassed him and made him look like an amatuer.
Mitchell- A decent opponent, definitly past his prime, but a good warmup for the then undisputed champ at 147.
Judah-yes, coming off the baldomir loss, but he came in focused and in shape. Zab got off to an excellent start, but Floyd made the necessary adjustments and dominated the rest of the fight.
Zu washed up? lol, why ? he just demloished Sharmba, soften him up a bit for Floyd..
Rickey KO'D Massau, he was never knocked out before..just stopped on a but. he had just KO harris,,for his title..
Callzo..slick southpaw..big guy..was Ricky first fight at welter...Floyds first fight was SHARMBA..and it was his first fight at welter too...
if you think Floyds last three opponents are more credible, then we have nothing to discuss
Comment