Originally posted by koolkc107
View Post
Possibly, I honestly don't know. I ain't got a horse in this race and it will play out as it does, I was merely clarifying their use of a term... I'm not 100% where I saw it now, I think on one of the earlier threads, but I think it has to do with DAZNs expectation of the uptake they'd get from a fight, in which case it might depend on whether they could prove such an expectation was reasonable... like I say I really don't know. Contract law most certainly ain't a field I've got knowledge in, more's the pity...

Looks to me though that DAZN shouldn't have written in a term to the contract that wasn't clearly defined and Canelo shouldn't have signed it without clarifying what was meant. Once again possibly coming down to what a judge considers 'reasonable'... though if there really ain't any specifications to the term I personally would think it reasonable that Canelo assumed he'd be facing other active boxers.
Comment