Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Steve Rolls & Szeremeta are ok. But Jacobs & Kovalev not good enough?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by sicko View Post
    GGG went around John Skipper to do his deal with DAZN that is why it was rumors going around that he was given Equity/Ownership in DAZN

    I think I seen something about GGG best Friend is the Owner or he has ownership in DAZN or something like that so that could be the reason maybe
    Well Dan Rafael disclosed GGG’s purses and he got $7.5 mil cash and the rest “equity.”

    If DAZN are consistent with all these cuts along with other business worldwide doing cuts, then perhaps he too got the notice of a paycut. It’s just shameful that Industry doesn’t report it. There’s no date for the $100mil high profile GGG nor rarely any news...

    I think GGG would get $3.5mil per fight tbh. GGG Promotions ain’t having it

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post
      Isn't that a pretty big double standard?
      How does a $100mil fighter in GGG rarely get any coverage?

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by koolkc107 View Post
        Exactly why DAZN is toast in court when it comes to defining "premium opponent".

        Even worse, the Mensas running DAZN said two MMA guys and a 47 year old were "premium".

        DAZN had better get ready to write some big checks...
        Not arguing either way over whether the definition is a good one or not but I believe when they used the term 'premium' they were refering to the amount of revenue they believed an opponent might create rather than to their quality as a boxer.

        In short they were saying we'll pay you big $$$ if we think the fight will bring in plenty of subs. As to whether that was within their contractual rights is for the courts to decide. Could be there will be some debate over precisely what the two sides understood the term to mean.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by lolpz View Post
          How can you claim that the same standards are being applied when Jacobs and Kovalev are legitimate top 3 in their division and world champions when Canelo fought them, as opposed to Rolls and Sczarcrameto who aren’t even top 50?

          Canelo gets criticized for fighting top opposition meanwhile GGG gets criticized for fighting bums. What does Canelo have to do to get credit? He’s already jumped like 5 weight classes and he’s physically smaller then GGG. Those are not the same standards...
          Physically smaller? Are you blind? Yall fanboys claim hes the best p4p and G isnt, yet yall compare them the same....either stick to your script or admit they ARE on the same level....then you can complain.

          Imo, Saul fought weak versions of Danny and Kov. Made danny adhere to some weak demands and fought a wack version of Kov that even Kov said was bs!

          G fighting rolls and not as of yet Szer, are weak fights as well.

          Thats what OBJECTIVE fans do. Not big up 1 and hate on the other. But I'll let you fanboys tell it...

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by El_Mero View Post
            Physically smaller? Are you blind? Yall fanboys claim hes the best p4p and G isnt, yet yall compare them the same....either stick to your script or admit they ARE on the same level....then you can complain.

            Imo, Saul fought weak versions of Danny and Kov. Made danny adhere to some weak demands and fought a wack version of Kov that even Kov said was bs!

            G fighting rolls and not as of yet Szer, are weak fights as well.

            Thats what OBJECTIVE fans do. Not big up 1 and hate on the other. But I'll let you fanboys tell it...
            Danny lost $800K from his $12mil to be whatever weight he wanted since he bypassed the morning weigh in and paid the huge fee. But he “weak” doe.

            The Krusher got schooled because forum members here actually laugh at about Canelo’s high guard because they don’t understand boxing. Canelo has returned firepower for those infamous right hands that GGG and Jacobs threw, the same counter he neutralized on Kova’s right hand. When you’re watching the fights do you understand the chess match from elites?

            Comment


            • #36
              love how Gturds claim Jacobs was weak opponent for Canelo...... yet hes GGG's best win and only number challenger win to date.

              so Canelos crap is GGG's best ever.

              ahahaha.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post
                There are posters on this forum who crap on Canelo endlessly for his DAZN fights, while defending Golovkin endlessly at the same time.

                It is irksome to see those double standards.
                Who are these people and where are the posts?

                Prove it, liar

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by El_Mero View Post
                  Physically smaller? Are you blind? Yall fanboys claim hes the best p4p and G isnt, yet yall compare them the same....either stick to your script or admit they ARE on the same level....then you can complain.

                  Imo, Saul fought weak versions of Danny and Kov. Made danny adhere to some weak demands and fought a wack version of Kov that even Kov said was bs!

                  G fighting rolls and not as of yet Szer, are weak fights as well.

                  Thats what OBJECTIVE fans do. Not big up 1 and hate on the other. But I'll let you fanboys tell it...
                  You can’t compare proven world level top 3 ranked opposition to Steve Rolls and Sacramento, that is not objective. These are facts, they are not comparable in any way, shape, or form.

                  Acknowledging that GGG is physically bigger then Canelo is not fanboying, it’s a fact. Just because Canelo is genetically gifted and has the ability and skills to fight in different weight classes doesn’t make him naturally bigger man. You saw them stand beside each other fight night on two occasions, it was clear GGG was the bigger man.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by R-Hand Southpaw View Post
                    What about GGG!??

                    See. You did it again.

                    That's the best defense you have when you need to protect your master Canelo. Like a ****** dog who doesn't know when to stop barking pretending they know how the world works when all you know is your backyard.

                    Woof woof woof.

                    I think that fits you even better than being a closet gay. You can be my dog and ill call you bidness.

                    Bidness! Beg! Its ****ing 6am and I can see you've already been here for a while.
                    Lmao..... Too funny

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Citizen Koba View Post
                      Not arguing either way over whether the definition is a good one or not but I believe when they used the term 'premium' they were refering to the amount of revenue they believed an opponent might create rather than to their quality as a boxer.

                      In short they were saying we'll pay you big $$$ if we think the fight will bring in plenty of subs. As to whether that was within their contractual rights is for the courts to decide. Could be there will be some debate over precisely what the two sides understood the term to mean.
                      Even if you're right about what DAZN considers "premium" that kinda helps Canelo's case more than it hurts it.

                      Who's going to buy a boxer vs MMA guy again after the Mayweather v McGregor fiasco. And it can be argued that today's casual fan doesn't even know who De La Hoya is.

                      It makes DAZN look worse, not better.

                      It makes the judges job easier too.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP