Is Eubank’s win over DeGale better than BJS’ win over Andy Lee?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • techliam
    Caneloweight Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Apr 2012
    • 5526
    • 371
    • 23
    • 42,424

    #11
    Probably about the same
    Doesn't matter that much though, considering BJS beat Eubank

    Comment

    • RJJ-94-02=GOAT
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Oct 2017
      • 28905
      • 9,231
      • 2,039
      • 246,831

      #12
      Originally posted by Al Broker
      DeGale is a Gold Medalist
      So was Audley Harrison what’s your point...

      Lee was on a good run of form, DeGale was cashing out and helping to fund his ******* habit.

      Comment

      • Thuglife Nelo
        Banned
        • Dec 2018
        • 26836
        • 1,299
        • 1,822
        • 654,176

        #13
        Originally posted by ShoulderRoll
        That says it all.
        Originally posted by RJJ-94-02=GOAT
        So was Audley Harrison what’s your point...

        Lee was on a good run of form, DeGale was cashing out and helping to fund his ******* habit.
        So Lee was on a “good run” but when Kovalev is on a good run to win back his title against Alvarez and stop Yarde all of a sudden because it’s against Canelo it’s not a “good run”lol

        Comment

        • Thuglife Nelo
          Banned
          • Dec 2018
          • 26836
          • 1,299
          • 1,822
          • 654,176

          #14
          Originally posted by alexguiness
          Eubank does not have a single decent win over a prime fighter.

          Saunders win over Lee was pretty comprehensive and for a world title.

          Both guys are guilty of the same thing, but Eubank is clearly the more limited fighter.

          If Eubank was the real deal, he would have beaten a battle worn Groves, yet he was totally schooled.
          So could BJS have beaten Groves that night too? BJS looks like trash at 168+

          Comment

          • dan_cov
            Zombie Taylor
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jun 2011
            • 24828
            • 3,311
            • 3,330
            • 145,001

            #15
            I'd probably give the edge to Lee being the better win based on him being much fresher than DeGale.

            Lee could have likely made another run but decided to get out with his faculties intact, DeGale lost his last braincell in there.

            I don't think any other fighter shipped as much punishment as DeGale did in under 30 pro fights. Virtually every fight win, lose or draw he took a horrendous amount of punishment. Glad for his sake he retired early and didn't continue trying to go on.

            Comment

            • boliodogs
              Undisputed Champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • May 2008
              • 33358
              • 824
              • 1,782
              • 309,589

              #16
              Originally posted by Al Broker
              How come BJS never talked smack about Eubank beating DeGale? BJS was quiet widdit!
              Yes it was a much better win. Saunders just barely b eat Eubank years ago but Eubank would beat him now. Eubank is young, fast, hits hard, boxes well, takes a good punch and has a high punch output per round and good stamina. Saunders does not talk about him because he does not want to fight him. Canelo never says his name for the same reasons.

              Comment

              Working...
              TOP