Why Didn’t Floyd give PAC rematch when he said “with one arm yes..” #Castillo

[koolkc107]

I think his refusal to rematch DLH had more to do with who would have been in Oscar's corner during a rematch than Oscar himself.

The fight with DLH was not as close as the first fights with Castillo and Maidana, both of which Floyd clearly won anyway.

But, those two were close enough to warrant a second fight. DLH's really wasn't.

As for the Pac rematch, we saw Floyd immediately after be fine with a rematch. After Manny came out with bogus excuse, that's when Mayweather changed his mind.

I have to mention one more thing.

Anyone trying to justify Pacquiao’s attempted use of Toradol is in effect saying they are ok with a less than level playing field.

[IceTrayDaGang]

You're full of shyt. The only two fighters that fought Floyd close (Maidana and Castillo) both got rematches. What did you see in the first fight that leads you to believe that Pac could ever beat Floyd?

the whole point of this is about money!!! floyd earned his biggest purse fighting pac.. so if it was that easy, why not run it back and rob the bank again? this is not about if the fight was close, etc.. floyd is about money right? and if the fight is not close, that would make even more sense for floyd to do the rematch and get an easy BIG pay day again.........................

[hugh grant]

Floyd EASILY beat Canelo and Manny. No need for a rematch in either case. Floyd had razor close fights with Maidana and Castillo, so they got rematches. You can spin your anti Floyd agenda if you want but it's just that simple.

You make no sense. We want to know who is better. You say Floyd is better than Pac and nel o as he beat them? So what if Floyd rematches Pac and Pac beat floyd, then you couldn't say Floyd is better than Pac h2h could you! Comprende?
You can't say Floyd is better than Pac as he beat pac but not give rematch! Especially more so when Pac has greater resume and so will nel o by end of his career
I bet this goes all over your head too deep for you. I'm not clever but I'm not blinkered like you that's for sure.
You think if you pretend to not understand me everything will be ok.

[Outwest Exp 355]

Floyd said he was down for a rematch but TR was going to have to bankroll the fight. They did the first fight and TR was going to have to do the rematch.

[Combat Talk Radio]

As for the Pac rematch, we saw Floyd immediately after be fine with a rematch. After Manny came out with bogus excuse, that's when Mayweather changed his mind.

To remind others who don't remember that moment:

[BattlingNelson]

Yeah that's what I was thinking. And they did better than Pac.

Only fighter that could of won was Oscar. Don't know why they never rematched?

All three did better against Floyd then Pac.

Floyd ducked the agreed rematch and did his fake retirement hence ducking dlh and margarito.

[Combat Talk Radio]

Floyd ducked the agreed rematch and did his fake retirement hence ducking dlh and margarito.

Smoke and mirrors.

Oscar wrote in the contract that Floyd had to take such a rematch "within the year" (2007). Oscar's OWN words.

He then turned around and happily co-promoted (HE was in charge) a mega fight with the top guy at Jr. welterweight (Ricky Hatton) because Oscar wanted the money AND to try and weaken Floyd to try and get an advantage, just like he did with Manny later.

Floyd fought Hatton on December 8th of 2007. There would have been no time for a fight with Oscar. That was all media nonsense to make it seem like Floyd ducked it.

Oscar then retires; Floyd says he's ready for a rematch. Oscar then says he's content staying retired:

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Oscar De La Hoya (@oscardelahoya) on Jun 17, 2015 at 9:15pm PDT

[Goldie]

What I’m saying is for a fighter who claims to be the smartest “business man” or defacto PPV guy, and who said he’d beat PAC 100/100 times, then why didn’t rob the bank for another $200mil if he wouldn’t mind acknowledging to give PAC a chance to redeem himself for the #49 slot? Instead he gave the #49 spot to Berto for 500K PPV. That’s doesn’t make any sense who prides in making huge PPVs while saying PAC would’ve lost 100 times.

Something doesn’t add up. My theory is that Floyd perhaps thought a PAC with a better shoulder could perhaps win in the rematch.

Heres you’re answer right here. Now you can either accept what Mayweather says or don’t but either way drop the bullsht pretense of “I’m just asking a question”.

To remind others who don't remember that moment:

[just the facts]

You make no sense. We want to know who is better. You say Floyd is better than Pac and nel o as he beat them? So what if Floyd rematches Pac and Pac beat floyd, then you couldn't say Floyd is better than Pac h2h could you! Comprende?
You can't say Floyd is better than Pac as he beat pac but not give rematch! Especially more so when Pac has greater resume and so will nel o by end of his career
I bet this goes all over your head too deep for you. I'm not clever but I'm not blinkered like you that's for sure.
You think if you pretend to not understand me everything will be ok.

So unless Floyd beats Pac and Canelo multiple times, he's not better than they are? Surely even a dullard like you can see how ignorant that is.

[hugh grant]

So unless Floyd beats Pac and Canelo multiple times, he's not better than they are? Surely even a dullard like you can see how ignorant that is.

So I might as well say schmelling is better than louis, turpin is better than srr, Bradley is better than pac etc etc.? Pac can beat Bradley 3 times, so suggesting Floyd beat pac and nel o and dlh x2 isn't unreasonable!
Your still playing the you don't understand games?