Ruiz is dumb. Refuses a $4mil payday and a direct shot at being wbc mandatory, to fight arreola instead for nothing. Im sorry but the jokes on you. Ruiz vs whyte, would have had ruiz favourite if he came ready as he vs AJ 1.
you can't talk complete BS and expect people to be all daffodils and faeries over it mate.
i dont care about trolling, having fun etc, but genuinely lying, not giving someone credit, those type of actions piss me off.
a lot can be said about andy ruiz..and it's deserving because he's a bellend. when he beat AJ, at the time, i was genuinely happy for him because i thought he was a good guy. Evidently not.
browne wasn't absolute world level, but he had won a WBA regular belt against Chagaev (who was 37/38 at the time and the same age as browne). Chagaev's only previous losses were to Wladmir klitschko and povetkin.
At the time of the fight, Browne was most certainly respected..and came in as an undefeted big puncher looking to take Whyte's head off.
it isn't so much that it was a big acheivement worth mentioning on it's own, but collectively when you look at Whyte's resume, it's worth mentioning.
as for Whyte, the guy is likeable, the things he comes up with. proper sense of humour unlike these ****** yanks.
timestamped
Anyone with Lucas browne as a career highlight on resume is a hype job bum.
You just proved you know nothing about boxing by trying to claim Browne is a decent boxer. He is F grade.
Browne was last seen getting outclassed and KOd early by the mighty Dave Allen.. . Lol
Anyone with Lucas browne as a career highlight on resume is a hype job bum.
You just proved you know nothing about boxing by trying to claim Browne is a decent boxer. He is F grade.
Browne was last seen getting outclassed and KOd early by the mighty Dave Allen.. . Lol
was he or was he not unbeaten at the time having beaten Chageav?
therefore he was decent.
therefore it's worth mentioning him on the resume along with the other names he's fought.
As for dave allen, allen is not a bad fighter when he's got his head together..and meanwhile that ko at the hands of whyte done him, he's not the same anymore.
was he or was he not unbeaten at the time having beaten Chageav?
therefore he was decent.
therefore it's worth mentioning him on the resume along with the other names he's fought.
As for dave allen, allen is not a bad fighter when he's got his head together..and meanwhile that ko at the hands of whyte done him, he's not the same anymore.
My grandmas unbeaten too.
Tell me more about how good Dave Allen and Lucas browne are? ...
Lucas browne has always been f grade, whyte landing one of his telegraphed sloppy hooks on him, didn't suddenly turn him into f grade. You have been brain washed by Eddie Hearns hype.
Tell me more about how good Dave Allen and Lucas browne are? ...
Lucas browne has always been f grade, whyte landing one of his telegraphed sloppy hooks on him, didn't suddenly turn him into f grade. You have been brain washed by Eddie Hearns hype.
lmao it has nothing to do with EH you eejit.
i'm just responding to someone who was having a chuckle at lucas browne being mentioned on someone as a name on Whyte's resume.
my only point is, since he'd beaten Chagaev at the time and was unbeaten...before the whyte fight he was talking up a lot about taking whyte's head off.
It's easy for you to sit on your ar5e now and have a laugh, but at the time he was certainly respected.
you're granny would have knocked out Chagaev..im sure. she also would have 'box iz edd off'
Is Lucas browne even in top 100? He can't even hold down a bouncing job anymore.
He was hands picked by Eddie for whyte, from the other side of the world, as he is one of the few boxers bad enough, to guarantee whyte a highlight reel ko.
And then Dave Allen got a highlight reel KO off him too, and people conveniently forgot about it lol
Comment