What Happened When Floyd Mayweather Took On Jose Luis Castillo (HIS ONLY LOSS?)

[daggum]

People have no issue saying jm m best pac 4 times. And most don't have a problem saying floyd lost 4 times also

floyd lost 50 times imo and im not biased at all

[daggum]

Forever trying to push what was a close, either way fight as a robbery.

Fight was close, Floyd got the decision.

That’s the fact of the matter here.

no. it was a schooling. a domination. a master class. like floyd against pac where pac landed the vast majority of hard clean punches and floyd didnt. we are living in a postmodernist world where words have no real meaning anymore i guess. the jmm-pac fights were also robberies!!! schoolings! masterclasses! dominations!

[The3]

2nd L was right here your team can not enter the ring that a DQ

[daggum]

2nd L was right here your team can not enter the ring that a DQ

floyds 2nd loss of 50. the other 48 came because he cheated his whole career using ped's and tue's therefore every fight was a loss. funny enough if judahs name was andre ward that would be a ko win.

[IronDanHamza]

no. it was a schooling. a domination. a master class. like floyd against pac where pac landed the vast majority of hard clean punches and floyd didnt. we are living in a postmodernist world where words have no real meaning anymore i guess. the jmm-pac fights were also robberies!!! schoolings! masterclasses! dominations!

Nah. Floyd-Castillo, and Marquez-Pac 1 2 and 3 were close either way fights. Which the press row media being 50-50 give or take showed.

Mayweather-Pacquaio for example was a clear win for Floyd which the press row media showed scoring 100% for Floyd.

You of course can’t seem to grasp the reality of that situation. Which is quite sad really considering we are 5 years on.

[IronDanHamza]

2nd L was right here your team can not enter the ring that a DQ

Discretion of the referee.

[RJJ-94-02=GOAT]

how did you score floyd vs pac...activity vs efficiency once again. although its pretty safe to say castillo landed far more effective punches than floyd did against pac but lets speak in broad terms

116-112 Mayweather.

[RJJ-94-02=GOAT]

no. it was a schooling. a domination. a master class. like floyd against pac where pac landed the vast majority of hard clean punches and floyd didnt. we are living in a postmodernist world where words have no real meaning anymore i guess. the jmm-pac fights were also robberies!!! schoolings! masterclasses! dominations!

You’re obsessed man...

Floyd’s a d***head but he deservedly retired at 50-0. Get over it...

[daggum]

You’re obsessed man...

Floyd’s a d***head but he deservedly retired at 50-0. Get over it...

no he didnt but my post was clearly a troll post

[daggum]

116-112 Mayweather.

so you preferred the activity over the clean punches in that one. why? or did you think floyd was landing cleaner? i legitimately dont know. i can see how someone can judge a fight live and be wrong but upon review it was pac with the much better punches so just wondering