Comments Thread For: WBC Prez: If Lopez Beats Lomachenko, He Has Merits To Be Recognized As Franchise Champ
Collapse
-
-
-
You can't be serious dude at least make sense in what you are trying to say Lomachenko won the WBC vacant belt against Campbell just a few weeks before Devin Email Haney fought Abdullaev for the "interim" belt so what do you mean the WBC champ is the one that is fought for.
It is just a cash grab by the WBC and it's pretty bull**** because it ruins the chance at an undisputed 135 champion on paper even though everyone who was a fan during this generation knows whoever wins this fight is the undisputed king at 135 Loma never lost his belt that he won just a few weeks before Haney meanwhile I think Devin Haney is the only fighter to become a 2 time champ via email must be nice to be politically tied when you haven't even fought a former world champion yet.
Don't act like Haney would have been ready for Lomachenko and Teo bypassed him somehow. Lopez earned his shot by demolishing a world champion in 2 rounds not fighting 12-0 Santiago and looking like garbage just like the Ndongeni and Burgos fights he has one good win in Abdullaev who was untested himself and that's about it how is he more deserving.
People forget they gave Santiago like 12 days notice to fight Haney meanwhile Devin knew he was fighting that day and had a full camp lol classic tactics. Haney messed up his shoulder he wouldn't have been ready to fight by May when the fight was originally scheduled so you are just reaching on some ho **** he got lucky with the Covid-19 so he was able to heal up and not get left behind as everybody was in the same situation but now you act like he can just jump in front of the line na how about he fights someone with a pulse first and then we can talk.Comment
-
Citizen Koba
See. Been telling everyone that if the WBC chooses to do these nonsensical and inconsistent rules for the “Franchise belt” means that Sulaiman can’t be trusted. As I said from the beginning, the WBC had setup Canelo with the Clenbuterol finding. What’s unfortunate is that VADA couldn’t take sides or even be objective because K2 would attack any objectivity in that WADA hadn’t established a threshold yet...
The WBC likes to impose belts on whomever. When the WBC kept on seeing that Canelo wasnt accepting these indigenous belts or REFUSING the REGULAR BELT, they decided to do the hit piece on Canelo. Isn’t it obvious?
Now look at this new Franchise fiasco for Lopez should he win?
Sulaiman can’t be trusted. It’s even said about the WBA and WBO. IBF only plays “nice” because they were dealt with before at the Federal level...Yes. I've said all along the franchise belt is utter bullchit and bad for the sport whoever holds it. And I've said all along I put the blame squarely on Mauricio and We Be Crooiks.
As ever though your weird conspiracies about the WBC picking on poor Canelo merely leave me confused.Comment
-
Comment
-
Yes. I've said all along the franchise belt is utter bullchit and bad for the sport whoever holds it. And I've said all along I put the blame squarely on Mauricio and We Be Crooiks.
As ever though your weird conspiracies about the WBC picking on poor Canelo merely leave me confused.
No dude it’s easy. You seem to forget that Canelo wasn’t fighting for the WBC belt in the first fight! How could you forget that? Mexicans, casual boxing fans, are most likely naive to the politics because they are gullible in that the WBC is the defacto belt in all of boxing since it’s a Mexican organization. It has its history. So when Canelo in Mexican sports media is refusing the belt in the GGG fight on 2017, how does that look towards the WBC? Canelo rejected every WBC associated belt since after Khan.
Mauricio has to maintain that image of his fathers legacy, and a Mexican superstar in Canelo denying his father’s (Jose) legacy, of course he’s going to be dealt with and not given benefit of doubt as VADA-WBC did for Francisco Vargas.
Easy work man. That’s politics for you.
Canelo is the only Mexican boxer to publicly refuse the WBC. The WBC doesn’t like that. But that’s how big Canelo is.Last edited by Thuglife Nelo; 08-14-2020, 01:32 PM.Comment
-
Comment
-
No dude it’s easy. You seem to forget that Canelo wasn’t fighting for the WBC belt in the first fight! How could you forget that? Mexicans, casual boxing fans, are most likely naive to the politics because they are gullible in that the WBC is the defacto belt in all of boxing since it’s a Mexican organization. It has its history. So when Canelo in Mexican sports media is refusing the belt in the GGG fight on 2017, how does that look towards the WBC? Canelo rejected every WBC associated belt since after Khan.
Mauricio has to maintain that image of his fathers legacy, and a Mexican superstar in Canelo denying his father’s (Jose) legacy, of course he’s going to be dealt with and not given benefit of doubt as VADA-WBC did for Francisco Vargas.
Easy work man. That’s politics for you.
Canelo is the only Mexican boxer to publicly refuse the WBC. The WBC doesn’t like that. But that’s how big Canelo is.
IBF I like their rules but mandos almost ALWAYS suk!! And usually leave the #1 and 2 spot blank for the highest bidder I assume.Comment
-
No dude it’s easy. You seem to forget that Canelo wasn’t fighting for the WBC belt in the first fight! How could you forget that? Mexicans, casual boxing fans, are most likely naive to the politics because they are gullible in that the WBC is the defacto belt in all of boxing since it’s a Mexican organization. It has its history. So when Canelo in Mexican sports media is refusing the belt in the GGG fight on 2017, how does that look towards the WBC? Canelo rejected every WBC associated belt since after Khan.
Mauricio has to maintain that image of his fathers legacy, and a Mexican superstar in Canelo denying his father’s (Jose) legacy, of course he’s going to be dealt with and not given benefit of doubt as VADA-WBC did for Francisco Vargas.
Easy work man. That’s politics for you.
Canelo is the only Mexican boxer to publicly refuse the WBC. The WBC doesn’t like that. But that’s how big Canelo is.
Man, I really got to explain this again?
The WBC did give Canelo the 'benefit of the doubt' though. Mauricio was proclaiming his innocence before even a shred of evidence had been released either way. It was NAC who issued the suspension for Canelo - and they pretty much had their hands tied because of the publicity surrounding the fight and the fighters and because of the strong stance they'd declared on drug use. The Vargas case was decided by CSAC - a different jurisdiction at a different time in a much lower profile fight.
I genuinely can't understand why you keep insisting that the Vargas situation in some way proves some odd conspiracy about the WBC 'punishing' Canelo, specially when it seems utterly obvious to anyone with eyes that Mauricio probably loves Saul better than his own kids.
Can I prove that Canelo's failed Clenbuterol tests and suspension weren't some kinda conspiracy by the WBC to put the kid in his place? Nope. They're certainly crooked enough to do such a thing.
Do I believe such a scenario is probable or makes any sense whatsoever? No. For me it's right up there with one of Ms Koba's artifical moon conspiracies.Comment
-
Lol. Stopped reading here. If you’re going to conspire against someone isn’t it a nice trick to avoid su****ion? You don’t think Canelo’s Team whom knew about WBC-CBP would inquire about their roles? Especially when there was already animosity between them? Of course Sulaiman was going to act the fool and act like he would be on Canelo’s side. LolComment
Comment