Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Hearn: I'm Almost Certain That Canelo's First Choice is Callum Smith

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Jab jab boom View Post
    nope, when multiple boxers are saying the same exact thing about the same exact person, then you have to use the common denominator logic to realize who's the real problem. It's not everyone else, Canelo is the problem and you're gonna have to face that. Even if he's the man that you adore. It's like when you got cheated on, your boys were telling you for a while, but you refused to see it. Until that one day you saw another dude smashing her out and had to face reality that you were blinded by love. Same scenario here, you simp.
    Haha! “Saying” what’s the offer to Smith’s demands for Canelo? What’s the difference? You have no confidence in Smith, and Smith believes he’s getting KO’d. Or else he’d jump on the pay knowing there’s a rematch should he win.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Mexican Bidness View Post
      Haha! “Saying” what’s the offer to Smith’s demands for Canelo? What’s the difference? You have no confidence in Smith, and Smith believes he’s getting KO’d. Or else he’d jump on the pay knowing there’s a rematch should he win.
      Nah he just knows there's also a good chance he'll get robbed and Canelo will move on and never look back. Look at some of canelos absurd scorecards, a judge gave him 10 rounds vs trout, 9 rounds vs Lara, a draw vs Floyd, 11 rounds vs Cotto, 10 rounds vs ggg, judges had him beating khan when he was clearly losing at the time of ko. Those aren't just bad scores, those are ridiculous. Now find me 1 bad one against canelo. I rest my case.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Jab jab boom View Post
        Nah he just knows there's also a good chance he'll get robbed and Canelo will move on and never look back. Look at some of canelos absurd scorecards, a judge gave him 10 rounds vs trout, 9 rounds vs Lara, a draw vs Floyd, 11 rounds vs Cotto, 10 rounds vs ggg, judges had him beating khan when he was clearly losing at the time of ko. Those aren't just bad scores, those are ridiculous. Now find me 1 bad one against canelo. I rest my case.
        Lol. “Clearly losing.” I think I’m the main poster on the forum who exposed you bruh. That’s all because you defended those mailbags. Nobody on the forum believes Khan was in control after the 2nd round. Canelo in Round 3 changed it up and Khan got spooked with nothing to show and got smashed. Nobody feels Khan was beating Canelo.

        Mexican Bidness bruh!

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Mexican Bidness View Post
          Lol. “Clearly losing.” I think I’m the main poster on the forum who exposed you bruh. That’s all because you defended those mailbags. Nobody on the forum believes Khan was in control after the 2nd round. Canelo in Round 3 changed it up and Khan got spooked with nothing to show and got smashed. Nobody feels Khan was beating Canelo.

          Mexican Bidness bruh!
          you choose to focus on the 1 five round fight that I mentioned and ignored all of the 12 round fights. Lmaooo you're a clown. You couldn't find 1 bad scorecard against canelo and couldn't make a valid argument defending the numerous ridiculous scorecards in his favor. Like I told you last time, you're the biggest ret@rd on this site and the only people who agree with anything you say are the other Canelo inbreds who are known to be the 2nd dumbest group among boxing fans.. Behind only pac fans. You're on pace to be the first guy with 30000 posts in just 2 yrs and yet still have 0 rep. Numerical proof that nothing you post has any logic or sense.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Jab jab boom View Post
            you choose to focus on the 1 five round fight that I mentioned and ignored all of the 12 round fights. Lmaooo you're a clown. You couldn't find 1 bad scorecard against canelo and couldn't make a valid argument defending the numerous ridiculous scorecards in his favor. Like I told you last time, you're the biggest ret@rd on this site and the only people who agree with anything you say are the other Canelo inbreds who are known to be the 2nd dumbest group among boxing fans.. Behind only pac fans. You're on pace to be the first guy with 30000 posts in just 2 yrs and yet still have 0 rep. Numerical proof that nothing you post has any logic or sense.
            Yeah because Khan was the funniest fight you mentioned that Canelo was “losing.” Lol. There are no 22 year olds in the current game that were moving defensively like Canelo against elites!

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Mexican Bidness View Post
              Yeah because Khan was the funniest fight you mentioned that Canelo was “losing.” Lol. There are no 22 year olds in the current game that were moving defensively like Canelo against elites!
              let's see, ESPN had khan winning as did most on press row. But it's a moot point as we all knew Canelo took that fight as 1 of his many scams because we all knew 1 good shot and khan would go to sleep. Aight, you're too ****** to waste any more time on. You're way too inferior in every way for me to further this pointless debate that you clearly lost 5 posts ago. Stop commenting on my posts, you're not smart enough to keep up.

              Comment


              • #37
                No more canelo or ryan retire both

                Nobody wants to see canelo nor ryan anymore just retire them they already act and live like it

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Jab jab boom View Post
                  let's see, ESPN had khan winning as did most on press row. But it's a moot point as we all knew Canelo took that fight as 1 of his many scams because we all knew 1 good shot and khan would go to sleep. Aight, you're too ****** to waste any more time on. You're way too inferior in every way for me to further this pointless debate that you clearly lost 5 posts ago. Stop commenting on my posts, you're not smart enough to keep up.
                  Don’t give up! Every day you wake up Canelo is P4P #1 cause that’s the way the world turns! The morning coffee is great!

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Jab jab boom View Post
                    Sorry but nobody with a credible world title at 168 is going to sit back and take millions less while a guy with a fake wba regular title makes over 30 mil. Doesn't matter how many little male groupie b***h fans he has on this site, no sensible person that's an established world champion is making that sort of sacrifice. Especially with the knowledge that they'd have to knock Canelo out cold in order to just earn a draw.
                    Green sent for this post. This is cold truth right here. I do think some of these guys are pricing themselves out but they shouldn't sell their titles for cheap either. No way to beat Nelo without a knockout plain and simple.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Mexican Bidness View Post
                      You have no confidence in Smith. If Smith beat Canelo there’d be a rematch. Derp derp. A low ball offer? Lol. As long as many U.K. fans themselves felt and created a narrative that Ryder beat Smith, nobody doesn’t care if Smith doesn’t fight Canelo. Smith is now becoming a joke on the forum. Smith will outgrow this division sooner, so the more he waits, the less attractive it becomes.
                      The only way to beat Nelo is by knockout and Smith isn't capable. It's not possible to beat him on points.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP