Canelo was what 19? 20? When he fought Hatton who was in his prime and had a solid record.
Comments Thread For: Daily Bread Mailbag: Pacquiao, Davis-Santa Cruz, Joe Joyce, More
Collapse
-
-
1. Like I said before stop deflecting. Ohh but what about meldrick Taylor oh what about vanes. It's not the same scenario because in Canelo vs Hatton, you had 2 guys who didn't deserve a title shot at that time, not just 1.
2. The only thing you expose when you post is that you're a Mexican phag boy who thinks Canelo can do no wrong. He can slap your mom in her face and spit on her and you'd defend him.
3. Hatton was a welterweight who at times fought other welter weights at catch weights above 147. But he didn't have a fight at 150 or higher for 5 yrs when the wbc gave him a 154 pound title shot. You can't use semantics with me dumbass, I'm too smart for you.
4. Wtf is a wbc silver belt. Foh. Shet may as well be a wwe title. That doesn't mean a damn thing.
Damn your a HYPOCRITEComment
-
The other ret@rd already tried to use that argument and I said, vanes didn't do s*** to deserve anything. It's a shame Canelo had to use PEDs because if he didn't, that crap fight never would've happened. But that was 1 undeserving person in a title fight. Canelo vs Hatton was 2 undeserving people getting a shot at a vacant title. Not the same thing. Try and keep up little guy.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
Comment