Pacquiao vs lomachenko

[hotshot1]

Not based on them fighting each other but based on who you think is better and who would you rather watch?
Who has the better offense that has a better punch volume and power and who is better defensively in your opinion?

[kingstip9]

Not based on them fighting each other but based on who you think is better and who would you rather watch?
Who has the better offense that has a better punch volume and power and who is better defensively in your opinion?

Pacquiao is the more proven fighter with resumes being worlds apart.
Even at Pacquiaos older stage, he’s able to compete in a higher weight class and perform right near the top.

Pacquiaos peak was a pleasure to watch, a real atg.
I don’t see that special factor with lomachenko who I think stayed waaaay too long in the amateurs.

[Earl-Hickey]

Pacquiao by a country mile.

Yeah Lomachenko is a very good very well schooled technician with obvious skill, but honestly his résumé isn't great, there's no "legendary nights" on there that will go down in history, I haven't seen him pull off any stunning wins vs much bigger opponents, none of it.

In his last fight he fought Luke Campbell who isn't very good, trust me he's not, but I don't know if it was Lomachenko being past prime or what but he didn't look great vs Campbell.

I think lomachenko might be past his best, and considering his pro career hasn't exactly been phenomenal so far that's a worry.

[MDPopescu]

Pacquiao is the more proven fighter with resumes being worlds apart.
Even at Pacquiaos older stage, he’s able to compete in a higher weight class and perform right near the top.

Pacquiaos peak was a pleasure to watch, a real atg.
I don’t see that special factor with lomachenko who I think stayed waaaay too long in the amateurs.

people always like to compare East-European fighters to all-time pro ATGs... (in this case Loma to Pacman)...
... I don't understand why people don't compare Leo Santa Cruz to Pac, for instance...

[Bunch Pag]

Pacquiao by a country mile.

Yeah Lomachenko is a very good very well schooled technician with obvious skill, but honestly his résumé isn't great, there's no "legendary nights" on there that will go down in history, I haven't seen him pull off any stunning wins vs much bigger opponents, none of it.

In his last fight he fought Luke Campbell who isn't very good, trust me he's not, but I don't know if it was Lomachenko being past prime or what but he didn't look great vs Campbell.

I think lomachenko might be past his best, and considering his pro career hasn't exactly been phenomenal so far that's a worry.

In a nutshell....

[Thraxox]

I mean, if Pacquiao that fought Diaz fought Luke Camp ell, he would have destroyed Campbell in 5.

[vinamars]

Pacquiao by a country mile.

Yeah Lomachenko is a very good very well schooled technician with obvious skill, but honestly his résumé isn't great, there's no "legendary nights" on there that will go down in history, I haven't seen him pull off any stunning wins vs much bigger opponents, none of it.

In his last fight he fought Luke Campbell who isn't very good, trust me he's not, but I don't know if it was Lomachenko being past prime or what but he didn't look great vs Campbell.

I think lomachenko might be past his best, and considering his pro career hasn't exactly been phenomenal so far that's a worry.

+1

[Luilun]

Pacquaio without steroids or HGH losses

[champion4ever]

This one is an easy one. It's Manny Pacquiao.

[boliodogs]

Pac is more exciting and a much harder puncher and a bit faster. When both are at their best I give Pac the edge. Loma was the more perfect boxer who made fewer mistakes. Pac was more explosive and threw lots more punches per round. Loma could win by KO but lacked Pac's vicious one punch KO power.