Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Day 9000: On a scale of 1-10, rate GGG’s win over Brook

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #71
    Originally posted by PRINCEKOOL View Post
    Destroyed his career and life in some ways 'You have to protect fighters from themselves, because most of these top fighters will fight anybody'.

    You can see things from a different vantage point as a promoter, Eddie Hearn should of stopped the fight going ahead.

    Chris Eubank Senior has managed Chris Eubank Junior's career better than Eddie Hearn managed Kell Brook 'Eubank Senior never once gave up track position, and now the big fights are coming' even his win against Degale came at the right time.

    Eubank Junior would of also been destroyed by Golovkin if he would of faced him many years ago 'Deep down Eubank Senior understood this etc'.
    What career ? Once he was too big for WW, his career was done.....and his WW legacy is pretty bare.

    Comment


    • #72
      Originally posted by BodyBagz View Post
      What career ? Once he was too big for WW, his career was done.....and his WW legacy is pretty bare.
      Kell Brook was unbeaten and high off life. A defeat in boxing is unlike a athlete just being beaten in a 100 m race or a football player loosing a football match 'Fighters lives can be turned upside down' Kell Brook career was derailed and his former life was destroyed.

      Comment


      • #73
        Originally posted by PRINCEKOOL View Post
        Kell Brook was unbeaten and high off life. A defeat in boxing is unlike a athlete just being beaten in a 100 m race or a football player loosing a football match 'Fighters lives can be turned upside down' Kell Brook career was derailed and his former life was destroyed.
        He had a couple of solid wins. His time was up when he no longer could make WW.

        Comment


        • #74
          Originally posted by Mexican Bidness View Post
          So GGG wanting Ward at 164 was pointless yeah? Should’ve been the full 168 innit
          It can be at any weight they want. That's how it works. You're asking me if I would consider it a legitimate win for Golovkin if they fought I would say no.

          Comment


          • #75
            Originally posted by BodyBagz View Post
            He had a couple of solid wins. His time was up when he no longer could make WW.
            He was a WBC world Champion, and unbeaten 'He always had those credentials to fall back on etc' The only way was up in his career, until his career was derailed and destroyed.

            At the peak of his career, he fought a totally unnecessary fight. No welterweight survives against Golovkin at that stage of his career 'Kell Brook was badly advised, for the sake some money'.

            Comment


            • #76
              Yikes some of this board is obsessed w/ triple g. 10s?? Anything above a 3 is suspect...

              Comment


              • #77
                Originally posted by PRINCEKOOL View Post
                Kell Brook was unbeaten and high off life. A defeat in boxing is unlike a athlete just being beaten in a 100 m race or a football player loosing a football match 'Fighters lives can be turned upside down' Kell Brook career was derailed and his former life was destroyed.
                Right but his career wasnt special prior to GGG fight. He had the Porter win and stayed in the UK otherwise.

                I really like Brook prior to GGG fight but yeah that fight ruined him. Most WWs fighting Top MWs will get ruined btw

                Comment


                • #78
                  Originally posted by PRINCEKOOL View Post
                  He was a WBC world Champion, and unbeaten 'He always had those credentials to fall back on etc' The only way was up in his career, until his career was derailed and destroyed.

                  At the peak of his career, he fought a totally unnecessary fight. No welterweight survives against Golovkin at that stage of his career 'Kell Brook was badly advised, for the sake some money'.
                  Unbeaten and untested. His career arc was not memorable. Had he swept up these champs now, a different story.

                  I don't think he would have beaten any credible guy above WW.

                  Comment


                  • #79
                    Originally posted by UNBANNED View Post
                    Right but his career wasnt special prior to GGG fight. He had the Porter win and stayed in the UK otherwise.

                    I really like Brook prior to GGG fight but yeah that fight ruined him. Most WWs fighting Top MWs will get ruined btw
                    It was about the quality of his life, and who he was as a person before the defeat. Understand what I am saying? The defeat to Golovkin destroyed him in multiple ways 'As a fighter and man'.

                    It is irrelevant what you thought about his career at that stage 'The fact of the matter is? He was the WBC Champion and unbeaten' full of optimism and passion at that stage in his life.

                    Comment


                    • #80
                      Originally posted by PRINCEKOOL View Post
                      He was a WBC world Champion, and unbeaten 'He always had those credentials to fall back on etc' The only way was up in his career, until his career was derailed and destroyed.

                      At the peak of his career, he fought a totally unnecessary fight. No welterweight survives against Golovkin at that stage of his career 'Kell Brook was badly advised, for the sake some money'.
                      - -Kellie got the princely purse and U got the princely koolaide, a win/win for Kellie and koolaide/koolaid for U!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP