Comments Thread For: Keith Thurman To Errol Spence: Fight Me Or Leave The Division!

[Curtis2]

My bad..... thought every fan wanted to see these fighters step up, that appears to be the outcry

I surely hope you're not saying Terrance would be stepping up to washed up Keith?? If this fight ever happens which I seriously doubt, Keith would look for a way out faster than Khan did vs Terrance!

[JakeTheBoxer]

If Porter is measuring stick, we must say, Thurman beat him much better than Spence did.

[Ray*]

Thanks for the morning laugh “Keef” sometimes Thurman. Is 2022 the next get back year?

[SUBZER0ED]

———-

What about Brandon Rios and Broner getting shots at Pac-Man?
Who did they have to beat to prove their relevance at 147? Why did Pac-Man elect to fight them or even the other bums he fought (Vargas, Clottey, Margarito, etc)

I'm not saying Thurman needs to prove his relevance in order to fight Spence or anyone else. I'm saying that after his long layoff and subsequent loss to old man Pac, he needs a big win to prove his relevance in general. A win over Spence may prove that, though I believe that horrible accident may have diminished Errol.

[Oregonian]

I'm not saying Thurman needs to prove his relevance in order to fight Spence or anyone else. I'm saying that after his long layoff and subsequent loss to old man Pac, he needs a big win to prove his relevance in general. A win over Spence may prove that, though I believe that horrible accident may have diminished Errol.

———-

And my question stays the same, did Broner or Brandon Rios get a big win in order to stay relevant and get a chance to fight PAC?
I could throw in Mathysse and Clottey and Margarito.
Heck! I’m throwing Mosley in too. Mosley got soundly beaten by Floyd. All everyone remembers in a fight that went 12 rounds and last 36 minutes is the two punches that Mosley landed.

Mosley then got a shot a the great PAC. And everyone said he was still relevant.

Do you see my point?

[SUBZER0ED]

———-

And my question stays the same, did Broner or Brandon Rios get a big win in order to stay relevant and get a chance to fight PAC?
I could throw in Mathysse and Clottey and Margarito.
Heck! I’m throwing Mosley in too. Mosley got soundly beaten by Floyd. All everyone remembers in a fight that went 12 rounds and last 36 minutes is the two punches that Mosley landed.

Mosley then got a shot a the great PAC. And everyone said he was still relevant.

Do you see my point?

Instead of staying on point with the current fighters that are the subject of this thread, you get in your time machine and start relating to past fighters and their different situations.

[Oregonian]

Instead of staying on point with the current fighters that are the subject of this thread, you get in your time machine and start relating to past fighters and their different situations.

————
You can deflect all you want which is typical but you’re responding to Thurman’s idea of a rematch with PAC.
You stated he needs a big relevant fight in order to warrant a fight with PAC (or anyone for that matter).

I’m literally using your own logic of PAC doing exactly the same thing by granting irrelevant fighters a chance to fight him.
If you believe Rios was relevant then Thurman has to be even if he was coming off a loss to PAC. Rios was coming off a loss just like all the other examples I listed.

But do your thing, deflect. As always.

[JakeTheBoxer]

Whoever beats Spence, will get a very little credit for that. It will be always "but Spence was injured".

Just look, fans are already full of excuses for Thurman losing to Pacquiao.

[MDPopescu]

Spence was supposed to fight Danny Garcia next, right?

[John Locke]

Keith already said he's a 'Truth Seeker'

Careful what you wish for cos you might get it!