Comments Thread For: Jerry Forrest On Jarrell Miller's PED Use: "That's Attemped Murder In My Eyes"

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Tecnoworld
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • May 2018
    • 1764
    • 279
    • 625
    • 21,338

    #31
    Hm, forrest was destroyed by Washington.

    Comment

    • Boxingfanatic75
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Jun 2018
      • 5298
      • 1,915
      • 714
      • 54,883

      #32
      Originally posted by True-Boxing-Fan
      Most deaths in the ring happen at the lower levels of boxing where testing is not as required or instituted. So we don’t know who is hot and who is not and because of that you don’t know if the deaths that happened in the ring were PED caused or not.

      Fact is PEDs do give an unfair advantage over the other guy in a sport that the objective is to hurt the other guy. Having an unfair advantage can compromise the other guys health. That’s fact.

      But in your mind PEDs in boxing is totally acceptable and there is nothing wrong with it at all.
      I never said PEDs were acceptable. And yes they do give an unfair advantage. However to state that they could compromise the opposition’s health or they could cause a death or have caused death is a farse. There’s has yet to be proven a death in the ring caused by steroids. Again it doesn’t happen.

      Comment

      • Boxingfanatic75
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Jun 2018
        • 5298
        • 1,915
        • 714
        • 54,883

        #33
        Originally posted by whollisboxing
        The problem is that "just one" would be one too many and nobody wants to wait for that before truly addressing the problem.

        To be fair, there hasn't been a death in the ring due to steroid use that we know of, however I'm sure there have been fights where a PED user won a fight that they would have lost otherwise.

        Just put yourself in a fighter's shoes for a second:

        You're fighting the fight of your life and you're up on the cards. You get your opponent in trouble and start emptying your tank to finish him off. On a level playing field, you probably win by stoppage but your opponent has super-human strength and stamina due to PEDs. He comes roaring back to stop you with a sudden burst out of nowhere and you can't figure out how he did it. That doesn't sound fair to me.
        I can buy your argument and it’s well thought out.

        Comment

        • Boxingfanatic75
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Jun 2018
          • 5298
          • 1,915
          • 714
          • 54,883

          #34
          Originally posted by The D3vil
          Well, that's an asinine way to determine anything, considering the richer fighters can afford to take drugs and get away with it.

          Lance Armstrong was the most drug tested athlete on the planet & didn't fail tests for like 10 years.

          We don't know how many fighters have been maimed & killed by guys who were roided up or had HGH.

          How many of these fights have been VADA tested?

          How many of the fighers were apart of the 24/7/365 program?

          Absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence.
          Thank god courts of law don’t operate under that assumption. I do get what you’re saying though.

          Comment

          • True-Boxing-Fan
            Banned
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Nov 2010
            • 3929
            • 430
            • 154
            • 80,671

            #35
            Originally posted by Boxingfanatic75
            I never said PEDs were acceptable. And yes they do give an unfair advantage. However to state that they could compromise the opposition’s health or they could cause a death or have caused death is a farse. There’s has yet to be proven a death in the ring caused by steroids. Again it doesn’t happen.
            How do you know it hasn’t happened. Show me a an article or whatever you’d like to show PEDs have never caused a death in the ring.

            Like I said most all deaths in the ring occur at the lower levels of boxing where testing is not required or is very sparse. So how do you know any death in the ring was not caused by the opponent being hot.

            Show me an article where it states that any deaths in the ring were not cause by the fighter being hot.

            Comment

            • KillaCamNZ
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Feb 2016
              • 3967
              • 200
              • 156
              • 29,082

              #36
              Originally posted by The D3vil
              Well, that's an asinine way to determine anything, considering the richer fighters can afford to take drugs and get away with it.

              Lance Armstrong was the most drug tested athlete on the planet & didn't fail tests for like 10 years.

              We don't know how many fighters have been maimed & killed by guys who were roided up or had HGH.

              How many of these fights have been VADA tested?

              How many of the fighers were apart of the 24/7/365 program?

              Absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence.
              Very, very well said, and your last line is a very fine summary.

              Comment

              • Boxingfanatic75
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Jun 2018
                • 5298
                • 1,915
                • 714
                • 54,883

                #37
                Originally posted by True-Boxing-Fan
                How do you know it hasn’t happened. Show me a an article or whatever you’d like to show PEDs have never caused a death in the ring.

                Like I said most all deaths in the ring occur at the lower levels of boxing where testing is not required or is very sparse. So how do you know any death in the ring was not caused by the opponent being hot.

                Show me an article where it states that any deaths in the ring were not cause by the fighter being hot.
                Wait, this is an article written to that extent and you’re defending it. Ok that’s fair....the onus is on you to prove or show PEDs have caused a death in the ring (to prove the negative). Criminal law doesn’t work the way you’re attempting to twist this around. The state (in this instance you) must prove PEDs have caused a death before one can make the statement they could cause death.

                Comment

                • REDEEMER
                  Banned
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Oct 2018
                  • 11820
                  • 1,336
                  • 1,008
                  • 153,574

                  #38
                  Forrest was informed Miller was probably dirty before he went through with the fight but took it anyway thinking he’d still win .

                  Now that it’s officially confirmed he’s just making points so those saying it’s not a big deal you don’t care well, you aren’t fighting for a secure top 10 spot and your career isn’t on the line. Ha


                  I’m pretty sure they have to care and take note what fighters are taking illegally ,they aren’t forum posters .
                  Last edited by REDEEMER; 07-08-2020, 03:48 AM.

                  Comment

                  • JakeTheBoxer
                    undisputed champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Dec 2014
                    • 20945
                    • 4,574
                    • 2,782
                    • 123,960

                    #39
                    Miller is the biggest idi.ot in sport ever.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP