Comments Thread For: Hearn on Fury-Joshua: Discussions Moving Forward on Deal
Collapse
-
-
I'll let you have the last wordComment
-
where are you from mug ? Is this fight the biggest fight ever to take between two British fighters and is Hearn representing the uk and to him in the biggest fight in history....when it will sell over 2 million box office on sky...when it will pack out Wembley stadium 2 times over ...when Saudi Arabia are willing to bid a 100 million pound site fee to host it.
So yes in his views it’s the biggest fight in history your just nick picking because Hearn said and you don’t like Hearn so just admit it.
Your just angry and trolling Hearn so just be honest about it.
A proper ****stick you are lolComment
-
Comment
-
If Fury vs AJ happens it will be in 10 years time, and will be AJ's cash out fight. That will prove he was never anything more than an Audley Harrison 2.0, or at best frank bruno 2.0.Comment
-
All you are arguments are just calling me 'dumb' rather than defending your position. Maybe that works in your infant school but not against adults.Comment
-
Damn bro, can you communicate your point without being all vulgar and racist?Comment
-
That's a better reality than an actual two fight deal - why the fook should be public be forced to also be stuck with 2 fights that they might not want? I don't expect the first to be competitive. I want Fury to fight other fighters.
Christ, he's already fighting Wilder 3 times, no one outside of AJ ballwashers wants to see that fight more than once. Outside of extreme controversy, let them fight other people.
It's like Bradley/Pacquiao III all over again, shoving fights down our throats we don't want. Imagine having to wait almost 2 years to see your guy fight someone different and exciting because they are contractually obligated to fighting the same two boring people back to back.Comment
-
Comment
Comment