Comments Thread For: Tyson Fury: I'm The Greatest Fighter, Heavyweight Who's Ever Lived

[184guy2]

This guy almost got stopped by Otto Wallin.

Actually he got , but the Vegas referee did the dirty job and helped his ass

[KillaMane26]

Tyson sound like Vegeta everytime he got a little stronger and his ego sky rocketed

[Emperor Trump]

Oh really?

[IMG]https://media.*****.com/media/cMgZjHgPDbwu4/*****.gif[/IMG]



AJ is gonna shatter that glass chin.

[Zodogg]

In the HW era of the late 80s To 90s u wouldn't be top 10

[Boxviewer]

Foreman and Lyle in their prime would've killed this clown in the ring. A guy who hasn't defended a belt against a top fighter calling himself the best boxer ever is a joke taken too far.

[AdonisCreed]

Klitchsko wasn't in his prime when he fought Fury and Wilder (whom people see as a technically flawed fighter) are both good wins but not enough to declare yourself the best of all time. The way people trash Wilder for only having power doesn't boost you into all time great status because if that's the case one would also have to see Wilder as a future Hall of Fame fighter. We know Klitchsko will be a hall of famer no doubt but will Wilder become one?? He has to beat AJ to further cement his legacy just for the Heavyweight division not including comparing to fighters in other weight classes. Tyson Fury is A bad man but greatest ever I think not lol haha

[AdonisCreed]

He’s back on that booger sugar.

Stop it!! Haha haha haha lol

[OldTerry]

objectively he's so much taller than those guys...it's not even a question of 'if he'd beat them'. Foreman at 6ft4 was a monster of his time. Athletes/fighters are bigger/stronger/better now than they used to be. Maybe down the line this will change because people are hooked on internet **** and gaming..but the ones who grew up in the 90s/early 00s were lived a more physical lifestyle bt also got the benefits of natural selection and nutrition etc.

The better way to compare them is relative to how they dominated their era. If Fury beat all those names or a good chunk of them, id have no doubt that he's beaten more top names and has been the dominant HW of this era.

I can understand your reasoning, in fact we reasoned the same way back when I was young (and I'm 74) and people reasoned that way even much earlier. The truth is many of the fighters from earlier days were in extremely good shape and were just as strong as today's fighters and athletes in general. I'll just say that based on observation that size difference doesn't count as much in the heavyweight division as in lighter weight divisions. Too bad we can't actually match some of the all time greats from past eras with today's fighters. There would be some great fights with the guys from bygone days winning some and today's fighters winning some as well.

[boliodogs]

He had to settle for a draw with wilder and get of the floor to beat Cunningham so while he is a good heavyweight he is not the greatest of all time. When the old hard core boxing fans start saying you are the greatest of all time then maybe you really are. Just Fury saying it does not mean much. I can call myself the greatest heavyweight of all time but for some reason nobody believes me.

[BoxingJunkie]

If he beats all the best heavyweights of today and retires undefeated maybe he might be the best heavyweight ever but that's up for debate of course.