Tyson Fury already has a Top 10 ATG Lineal title reign.

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ShaneMosleySr
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Mar 2019
    • 10325
    • 1,049
    • 903
    • 276,311

    #21
    If you want to apply logic to all fighters, you should acknowledge that the lineal championship is determined by the Ring Magazine and TBRB for all fighters and that has always been the case.

    They said Fury wasn’t champion anymore and then he won the title back.

    Originally posted by W1LL
    If you want to use that logic then it is only fair the same logic be applied to ALL fighters, past and present. This would greatly alter tha amount of defences of some of the longest-reigning Lineal champions.

    Comment

    • Marchegiano
      Banned
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Aug 2010
      • 12208
      • 1,790
      • 2,307
      • 165,288

      #22
      Originally posted by ShaneMosleySr
      If you want to apply logic to all fighters, you should acknowledge that the lineal championship is determined by the Ring Magazine and TBRB for all fighters and that has always been the case.

      They said Fury wasn’t champion anymore and then he won the title back.
      Lineal is older than Ring though.

      Comment

      • ShaneMosleySr
        Banned
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Mar 2019
        • 10325
        • 1,049
        • 903
        • 276,311

        #23
        No one labeled it as a fight for the vacant lineal title after the event.

        Before the event, it was between the #1 and #2 ranked heavyweights and everyone who looks at Ring magazine and TBRB knew it was for the lineal title.

        I can post links to multiple threads, including threads by me, where it was discussed how the winner would be the new lineal champion.

        I’m sure Ring Magazine wrote about it as well.

        So I don’t know where you got that idea.

        I also don’t know why you think anyone would pretend that Wilder won the lineal title from Fury instead of a vacant lineal if he won the fight. It makes absolutely no difference, it would still be Wilder’s first lineal championship victory.

        Originally posted by W1LL
        Talking about what is fair, how do these people purport to label Fury vs. Wilder II a vacant Lineal title fight AFTER THE EVENT? That is simply ridiculous. Guarenteed those same people would have happily agreed to Wilder having won the Lineal off Fury if it had turned out that way.

        Comment

        • LoadedWraps
          Official NSB POTY 2016
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Nov 2010
          • 24267
          • 1,021
          • 1,468
          • 190,165

          #24
          Originally posted by ShaneMosleySr
          Fury did retire.

          The two organizations that determine lineal championships said the position was vacant after he retired.

          He then won their titles back.

          I’m going by what they say, not by what Fury wants to be reality.

          Then I guess the legend of Fury will always contain two parallel realities where in one he has 6 defenses and in the other he reclaims it.

          In reality he never lost the title because he returned and never lost. Their narrative was a marketing ploy. Fury is the man who beat the man and remains the man until beaten.

          Heck we might as well elevate him to franchise and emeritus champion. Make him a boxing dictator. A boxing god.

          Comment

          • ShaneMosleySr
            Banned
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Mar 2019
            • 10325
            • 1,049
            • 903
            • 276,311

            #25
            Of course, but the Ring Magazine title IS the lineal championship. It’s a board of journalists that track the lineal title.

            Those rankings determine the lineal title.

            The only time that’s been disputed was when GBP purchased the magazine. Part of the ring editorial board revolted and that’s why there’s two organizations that track the lineal title. And that’s why they sometimes don’t agree.

            Originally posted by Marchegiano
            Lineal is older than Ring though.

            Comment

            • W1LL
              Celtic Warrior
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Dec 2004
              • 11851
              • 845
              • 916
              • 71,119

              #26
              FYI, Tyson Fury is ranked in the top 10 for longest reigns as Lineal Heavyweight champion at 4 years, 7 months. He has reigned for longer than notable names such as Rocky Marciano (3 years) and Joe Frazier (2 years, 11 months). He is not far behind outlasting Larry Holmes (4 years, 11 months), or Floyd Patterson who's two reigns combine at 4 years, 10 months.

              Comment

              • ShaneMosleySr
                Banned
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Mar 2019
                • 10325
                • 1,049
                • 903
                • 276,311

                #27
                There aren’t two parallel realities.

                There’s a story crafted by Tyson Fury and his promoters and there’s reality.

                Reality: The lineal title is determined by the rankings of journalists at the Ring Magazine and TBRB. They both determined Fury wasn’t lineal champion anymore because he announced his retirement and didn’t fight for three years.

                They also determined Fury won the title back because he and Wilder were the two best heavyweights in the rankings when they fought the second time and Fury won that fight.

                Tyson Fury and his promoters didn’t like that narrative. His comeback was easier to promote if he was a heavyweight champion. So they pretended he was one when he wasn’t.

                It was clearly effective because people like you ignore reality and unbiased rules to side with someone who’s clearly wants what’s best for themself.


                Originally posted by LoadedWraps

                Then I guess the legend of Fury will always contain two parallel realities where in one he has 6 defenses and in the other he reclaims it.

                In reality he never lost the title because he returned and never lost. Their narrative was a marketing ploy. Fury is the man who beat the man and remains the man until beaten.

                Heck we might as well elevate him to franchise and emeritus champion. Make him a boxing dictator. A boxing god.

                Comment

                • ShaneMosleySr
                  Banned
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Mar 2019
                  • 10325
                  • 1,049
                  • 903
                  • 276,311

                  #28
                  He didn’t fight for three years.

                  What a fair way to measure the length of his lineal title reign.

                  What would be more fair is if you used the standard that has been set for every other lineal champion in boxing history, being recognized by the Ring Magazine and TBRB.

                  If you do that, he’s been champion for a grand total of three consecutive months lol.

                  Originally posted by W1LL
                  FYI, Tyson Fury is ranked in the top 10 for longest reigns as Lineal Heavyweight champion at 4 years, 7 months. He has reigned for longer than notable names such as Rocky Marciano (3 years) and Joe Frazier (2 years, 11 months). He is not far behind outlasting Larry Holmes (4 years, 11 months), or Floyd Patterson who's two reigns combine at 4 years, 10 months.

                  Comment

                  • W1LL
                    Celtic Warrior
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Dec 2004
                    • 11851
                    • 845
                    • 916
                    • 71,119

                    #29
                    Originally posted by ShaneMosleySr
                    He didn’t fight for three years.

                    What a fair way to measure the length of his lineal title reign.

                    What would be more fair is if you used the standard that has been set for every other lineal champion in boxing history, being recognized by the Ring Magazine and TBRB.

                    If you do that, he’s been champion for a grand total of three consecutive months lol.
                    It is clear you don't know what you are talking about. There have been many, longer periods of inactivity from past Lineal champions than the time Tyson had out.

                    Comment

                    • ShaneMosleySr
                      Banned
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Mar 2019
                      • 10325
                      • 1,049
                      • 903
                      • 276,311

                      #30
                      Yes, but not after they announced their retirement and everyone stopped recognizing them as champion.

                      If Lennox Lewis came back today, he wouldn’t be the lineal champion for the last 17 years.

                      Why? Because he announced his retirement and Ring magazine stopped recognizing him as champion.

                      It would be f**king ****** to call him a 21 year lineal champion if he returned. But no one beat him! And thats your logic lmfao.



                      Originally posted by W1LL
                      It is clear you don't know what you are talking about. There have been many, longer periods of inactivity from past Lineal champions than the time Tyson had out.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP