Comments Thread For: Ward, Bradley Believe Fury is Making a Big Mistake With Wilder

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Rayzah
    Interim Champion
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • May 2017
    • 688
    • 120
    • 540
    • 15,980

    #21
    I see no different outcome, fury Is just better. Another one sided fight.

    Comment

    • KillaMane26
      Big Boi Beezy
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Apr 2014
      • 16299
      • 2,565
      • 533
      • 174,475

      #22
      Originally posted by LDBC Slayer
      If I was Wilder I'd do exactly that, he can save face that way.

      I'm sure PBC can spin some way to drag Ortiz out of the retirement home for the trilogy match, my friends at the LDBC would sell that to the US casuals as being a bold move by Brother Deontay.

      If Wilder fights Fury again unless he lands a fluke lucky punch then he loses, Fury has proven he is just far superior, obviously Wilder does have that punch which has bailed his useless ass out on multiple occasions so you can't entirely rule him out.

      I agree.... Wen u lose 85% rounds in 2 back 2 back fights. Its time to go the drawing board smh

      Comment

      • Get em up
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Dec 2019
        • 4448
        • 1,348
        • 1,177
        • 34,261

        #23
        Originally posted by denium
        The Fury that showed up in the first fight had been out of the ring for 3 years and had recently beat a drug and alcohol addiction and lost 10 stone, and that's the real version of Fury?

        Fury was visibly in miles better shape & healthier for the rematch, did you even watch the fights?

        Sit down pal.
        I definitely watched both fights and Fury/Klitsko and Fury/Wilder 1 are the same version of Fury. Elusive, moving, herky jerky style on a back paddle. As opposed to come forward with bad intentions in Fury/Wilder 2 I'm not discrediting Fury in any way shape or form. Just stating the obvious in the difference in Fury.
        Dont get so butt hurt I wasnt knocking the guy in the least. Why do people take offense so easy even when nothing bad was said? I dont get it.

        Comment

        • removed
          Undisputed Champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Nov 2008
          • 21479
          • 4,005
          • 831
          • 164,542

          #24
          Originally posted by Get em up
          I definitely watched both fights and Fury/Klitsko and Fury/Wilder 1 are the same version of Fury. Elusive, moving, herky jerky style on a back paddle. As opposed to come forward with bad intentions in Fury/Wilder 2 I'm not discrediting Fury in any way shape or form. Just stating the obvious in the difference in Fury.
          Dont get so butt hurt I wasnt knocking the guy in the least. Why do people take offense so easy even when nothing bad was said? I dont get it.
          I didn't take offense, however i don't believe the version of Fury in the first Wilder fight was anywhere near his best.

          This is yet another reason why Fury is better than everyone else, he's an adapter, he can fight in any style and adjust if things are not working.

          How will he approach the AJ fight? Will be come in Kronk style again? Or will he go back to his slick boxer style, how do you prepare for him if your AJ?

          AJ has faced some decent fighters in his day, but Tyson is a completely different box of tricks. Personally i don't think AJ can outbox Fury, or outfight him either.

          Comment

          • Beercules
            Lounge POTY '17
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Aug 2013
            • 65183
            • 4,940
            • 7,203
            • 950,179

            #25
            I don't think Wilder can beat Fury outside of a punch Fury doesn't see.



            I think he is in Wilders head for good. That was a historic ass whooping.




            He tasted his blood for **** sake ****ing couldn't believe it when I saw the fight live.


            I looked to my friends like "What the **** did he just do?!"

            Comment

            • hugh grant
              Undisputed Champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Apr 2006
              • 30131
              • 2,146
              • 819
              • 105,596

              #26
              Ward and Bradley not underestimating wilder, so I doubt fury is.
              Underestimating hardest hitter in world isn't likely as you know one punch is game changer

              Comment

              • hugh grant
                Undisputed Champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Apr 2006
                • 30131
                • 2,146
                • 819
                • 105,596

                #27
                Originally posted by Beercules
                I don't think Wilder can beat Fury outside of a punch Fury doesn't see.



                I think he is in Wilders head for good. That was a historic ass whooping.




                He tasted his blood for **** sake ****ing couldn't believe it when I saw the fight live.


                I looked to my friends like "What the **** did he just do?!"
                Never underestimate what a ref rescuing you from a further beating can do?
                Wilder might be so deluded to think he could have caught fury with lucky punch if ref let it go on in hindsight

                Comment

                • Boxing Scene
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Jan 2007
                  • 7105
                  • 915
                  • 1,705
                  • 29,819

                  #28
                  Wilder is getting knocked out again. He simply cannot fight on the inside.

                  Comment

                  • Lionbreech
                    Up and Comer
                    Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
                    • Feb 2020
                    • 44
                    • 13
                    • 12
                    • 1,477

                    #29
                    Punchers always have a shot.

                    Fury just proved in the second fight with Wilder something boxing experts knew. Wilder had deficiencies in both his boxing skills and defense which he had made up with great punching power. Wilder had been fighting for the most part opponents who did not have the skill level to exploit any of that yet still would sometimes get tagged by them. His long reach and eventually his power would catch them sooner rather than later. Fury is elusive and hard to hit and in the first fight he managed to survive while really for the most part outboxing Wilder although being knocked down twice. In the second fight he changed up became aggressive and exploited the deficiencies in Wilders defense and lack of boxing skills. I still give Wilder a punchers shot and nobody should overlook that. He knocked down Fury twice first time around when Fury was doing everything he could do to dance and avoid getting hit , that can definitely happen again. It took a Herculean effort for him to get up after the second one . Fury should still win because of his superior boxing skill but don't count Wilder out if you're smart. Especially in the heavys a puncher is always dangerous.

                    Comment

                    • rckdees
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Feb 2010
                      • 1277
                      • 224
                      • 12
                      • 14,924

                      #30
                      Now that the second fight is over everybody knew that was going to happen ...” the experts and everyone else knew about Wilder’s deficiencies “....last I checked Wilder was favored in both fights....clowns

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP