"Prime" Brandon Rios failed to make 135 and still refused to move up, when he finally did move up went life and death with a journeymen Mike Alvarado, then capped his career off by crying on TV after getting stopped by Timothy Bradley same Bradley he said had no punching power. Rios in his "prime" or otherwise was never a good fighter.
Comments Thread For: Terence Crawford: Pacquiao Wants The Fight; I Think It Can Get Made
Collapse
-
-
MANNYs destined to be UNDISPUTED
Tc will follow footsteps of thurman broner and the argentinian no.more.no.less
how many times the american i cant breath had bullied the.pac?? And in the end always shooked thier urangutan bald black head ******??? Lol...lol..pac is goat of boxing...americans just a lossers 🤣🤣🤣🤣Comment
-
Crawford will be the 2nd best fighter Manny faced in his entire career; a close second. Manny was younger than the #1 guy he faced and was completely ineffective. Bud will hurt him bad. Pac fans should not be clamoring for this fight.Comment
-
Missing the point. Nobody is comparing resumes or legacies. Clearly Manny is greater with regard to those. That doesn't mean he can still beat the best in the game today. He cannot and your feelings are really going to be hurt if and when we see this fight. Think Ali-Holmes, Tyson-Lewis, etc.Beat a prime pacquiao? Haha TC hasn't even fought a person in the same level as a Porter or any of the Garcias.
Yeah TC won by stoppage against Kavaliauskas but he didn't look good prior to the 9th. Crawford is not tested and has never fought against 1 hall of famer. Paq has fought legends into four decades. Not even Ali did that.Comment
-
-
Cant say that Crawford hasnt proved himself just yet, he been in with no one near Mannys class so he might fall flat on his face.
Dont get me wrong I see the potential in TC just saying he hasnt been tested and his opponents are not all that good.Comment
-
he landed the much cleaner punches so im not sure how that is completely ineffective. floyd couldnt really get much going at all so when you compare what pac was doing to floyd to what floyd was doing to pac it was far more effective,. you cac go round by round and most of the head rocking shots were pacs. sure it was ineffective if you compare pac to some of his other fights but is that how boxing should be scored? it would be like saying floyd was ineffective look how badly he beat gatti up and then he barely landed anything clean against pac so i guess pac won! that would be silly...all you have to do is compare what fighter a did to what fighter b did in that particular fight. sure it was boring but yeah floyd wasnt doing clean work for the most part so that should be a credit to pac but i guess you have your own way of scoring fightsComment
-
If youre a Steeple Chaser and run around the jumps because they are two high then its ineffective to itself. it failed to deliver what it promised to bring. This is a failure !he landed the much cleaner punches so im not sure how that is completely ineffective. floyd couldnt really get much going at all so when you compare what pac was doing to floyd to what floyd was doing to pac it was far more effective,. you cac go round by round and most of the head rocking shots were pacs. sure it was ineffective if you compare pac to some of his other fights but is that how boxing should be scored? it would be like saying floyd was ineffective look how badly he beat gatti up and then he barely landed anything clean against pac so i guess pac won! that would be silly...all you have to do is compare what fighter a did to what fighter b did in that particular fight. sure it was boring but yeah floyd wasnt doing clean work for the most part so that should be a credit to pac but i guess you have your own way of scoring fights
Floyd was Floyd and too a tee , Manny was shut down to his lowest output in his career and if you understand boxing its easy to see why.Comment
-
-
This right here.he landed the much cleaner punches so im not sure how that is completely ineffective. floyd couldnt really get much going at all so when you compare what pac was doing to floyd to what floyd was doing to pac it was far more effective,. you cac go round by round and most of the head rocking shots were pacs. sure it was ineffective if you compare pac to some of his other fights but is that how boxing should be scored? it would be like saying floyd was ineffective look how badly he beat gatti up and then he barely landed anything clean against pac so i guess pac won! that would be silly...all you have to do is compare what fighter a did to what fighter b did in that particular fight. sure it was boring but yeah floyd wasnt doing clean work for the most part so that should be a credit to pac but i guess you have your own way of scoring fightsComment
Comment