Comments Thread For: Terence Crawford: Pacquiao Wants The Fight; I Think It Can Get Made

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mister Wolf
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Jan 2012
    • 7432
    • 234
    • 14
    • 107,507

    #91
    Originally posted by legacygt777
    The old boxer was going to get ktfo against a prime Brandon Rios. Lmao
    "Prime" Brandon Rios failed to make 135 and still refused to move up, when he finally did move up went life and death with a journeymen Mike Alvarado, then capped his career off by crying on TV after getting stopped by Timothy Bradley same Bradley he said had no punching power. Rios in his "prime" or otherwise was never a good fighter.

    Comment

    • PACisG.O.A.T.
      Amateur
      • Jan 2019
      • 16
      • 1
      • 0
      • 1,532

      #92
      MANNYs destined to be UNDISPUTED

      Tc will follow footsteps of thurman broner and the argentinian no.more.no.less
      how many times the american i cant breath had bullied the.pac?? And in the end always shooked thier urangutan bald black head ******??? Lol...lol..pac is goat of boxing...americans just a lossers 🤣🤣🤣🤣

      Comment

      • NachoMan
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Nov 2007
        • 5644
        • 881
        • 799
        • 66,454

        #93
        Originally posted by revelated
        Crawford was wobbled multiple times and dropped by Kavaliauskas, who is nowhere near as fast as Manny.

        Crawford was Bambi'd by Gamboa.

        Crawford's temper would earn him a stoppage loss against Manny. He'll get pissed, try to go in and get Mosley'd.
        Crawford will be the 2nd best fighter Manny faced in his entire career; a close second. Manny was younger than the #1 guy he faced and was completely ineffective. Bud will hurt him bad. Pac fans should not be clamoring for this fight.

        Comment

        • NachoMan
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Nov 2007
          • 5644
          • 881
          • 799
          • 66,454

          #94
          Originally posted by legacygt777
          Beat a prime pacquiao? Haha TC hasn't even fought a person in the same level as a Porter or any of the Garcias.

          Yeah TC won by stoppage against Kavaliauskas but he didn't look good prior to the 9th. Crawford is not tested and has never fought against 1 hall of famer. Paq has fought legends into four decades. Not even Ali did that.
          Missing the point. Nobody is comparing resumes or legacies. Clearly Manny is greater with regard to those. That doesn't mean he can still beat the best in the game today. He cannot and your feelings are really going to be hurt if and when we see this fight. Think Ali-Holmes, Tyson-Lewis, etc.

          Comment

          • Gamer30168
            Contender
            Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
            • May 2020
            • 483
            • 17
            • 7
            • 10,047

            #95
            Do it! Very compelling fight!

            Comment

            • Roadblock
              Undisputed Champion
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • May 2006
              • 14031
              • 3,535
              • 428
              • 108,713

              #96
              Originally posted by NachoMan
              Crawford will be the 2nd best fighter Manny faced in his entire career; a close second. Manny was younger than the #1 guy he faced and was completely ineffective. Bud will hurt him bad. Pac fans should not be clamoring for this fight.
              Cant say that Crawford hasnt proved himself just yet, he been in with no one near Mannys class so he might fall flat on his face.

              Dont get me wrong I see the potential in TC just saying he hasnt been tested and his opponents are not all that good.

              Comment

              • daggum
                All time great
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Feb 2008
                • 43345
                • 4,516
                • 3
                • 166,270

                #97
                Originally posted by NachoMan
                Crawford will be the 2nd best fighter Manny faced in his entire career; a close second. Manny was younger than the #1 guy he faced and was completely ineffective. Bud will hurt him bad. Pac fans should not be clamoring for this fight.
                he landed the much cleaner punches so im not sure how that is completely ineffective. floyd couldnt really get much going at all so when you compare what pac was doing to floyd to what floyd was doing to pac it was far more effective,. you cac go round by round and most of the head rocking shots were pacs. sure it was ineffective if you compare pac to some of his other fights but is that how boxing should be scored? it would be like saying floyd was ineffective look how badly he beat gatti up and then he barely landed anything clean against pac so i guess pac won! that would be silly...all you have to do is compare what fighter a did to what fighter b did in that particular fight. sure it was boring but yeah floyd wasnt doing clean work for the most part so that should be a credit to pac but i guess you have your own way of scoring fights

                Comment

                • Roadblock
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • May 2006
                  • 14031
                  • 3,535
                  • 428
                  • 108,713

                  #98
                  Originally posted by daggum
                  he landed the much cleaner punches so im not sure how that is completely ineffective. floyd couldnt really get much going at all so when you compare what pac was doing to floyd to what floyd was doing to pac it was far more effective,. you cac go round by round and most of the head rocking shots were pacs. sure it was ineffective if you compare pac to some of his other fights but is that how boxing should be scored? it would be like saying floyd was ineffective look how badly he beat gatti up and then he barely landed anything clean against pac so i guess pac won! that would be silly...all you have to do is compare what fighter a did to what fighter b did in that particular fight. sure it was boring but yeah floyd wasnt doing clean work for the most part so that should be a credit to pac but i guess you have your own way of scoring fights
                  If youre a Steeple Chaser and run around the jumps because they are two high then its ineffective to itself. it failed to deliver what it promised to bring. This is a failure !

                  Floyd was Floyd and too a tee , Manny was shut down to his lowest output in his career and if you understand boxing its easy to see why.

                  Comment

                  • RuleOfTheSpear
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Jun 2018
                    • 3538
                    • 491
                    • 309
                    • 53,043

                    #99
                    Crawford is biting more than he can chew.

                    Manny may get away with victory

                    Comment

                    • RuleOfTheSpear
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Jun 2018
                      • 3538
                      • 491
                      • 309
                      • 53,043

                      #100
                      Originally posted by daggum
                      he landed the much cleaner punches so im not sure how that is completely ineffective. floyd couldnt really get much going at all so when you compare what pac was doing to floyd to what floyd was doing to pac it was far more effective,. you cac go round by round and most of the head rocking shots were pacs. sure it was ineffective if you compare pac to some of his other fights but is that how boxing should be scored? it would be like saying floyd was ineffective look how badly he beat gatti up and then he barely landed anything clean against pac so i guess pac won! that would be silly...all you have to do is compare what fighter a did to what fighter b did in that particular fight. sure it was boring but yeah floyd wasnt doing clean work for the most part so that should be a credit to pac but i guess you have your own way of scoring fights
                      This right here.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP