What a rubbish article. No wonder Hauser hasn’t written a book since 2004. Why are American sports writers the most consistently awful of all time? And this clown is going to to be in the HOF himself? Shows you what a joke that is.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Which Active Fighters Deserve To Be Called Great?
Collapse
-
-
Keith Thurman, Ricky Hatton and Tim Bradley future Hall Of Fame ??????? I do not believe they belong, they are not Hall of Fame worthy, period.
Comment
-
Another Hauser filler piece that could have been written by Captain Obvious.
Yet, he still couldn't help letting his opinion get in the way of facts.
Keith Thurman is a Hall of Famer?
By what yardstick?
His WBA belt, he was elevated to and defended once.
His WBC belt, he never defended.
Hauser is casual af sometimes.
Comment
-
Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post1) this is the most important point...
like I have always said, there is only one valid criteria for greatness... who did you beat, with consideration given to when/how
2) Keith Thurman is not a HOF'er... wtf ?
3) this comment was the funniest in light of recent "discussions"...
like I have always said... Golovkin is very good, just not as good as advertised
2/ agreed
3/ who are you kidding? You are the high-priest of the Golovkin hate sect
Comment
-
Keith Thurman won't sniff the hall of fame.
But I liked that Mikey Garcia got a mention in this article! A big win is needed here. This is why the Pacquiao fight is more than just money for Mikey, like everyone thinks. A win against a legend, a title in a 5th division. If Mikey can pull it off, he's a HOF as well! Bring the fight!
Comment
Comment