Comments Thread For: Whyte: Ngannou Reminds Me of That Other Deluded Coward Wilder
Collapse
-
Why did he test positive, then? Was that ever explained?I am not sure if you are deliberately misunderstanding me but I will respond anyway. The pre-workout was called Jack3d and it was popular over here for a while and was sold in loads of shops etc. Turns out it had geranium root in it or something which is a stimulant.That is what he got a ban for years ago.
According to UKAD he didn't have any Dianabol or anything else in his system which is why he didn't get charged with any offence.
Dillian Whyte Tested Positive For Two Dianabol Metabolites
Yesterday, July 24, BoxingScene.com reported that an "A" sample taken from Dillian Whyte by United Kingdom Anti-Doping (UKAD) tested positive for one or more banned substances prior to Whyte's July 20 fight in London against Oscar Rivas. BoxingScene has now confirmed that the substances were epimethandienone and hydroxymethandienone, two metabolites of the banned drug Dianabol.Comment
-
Comment
-
He wasn't sanctioned or punished in any way and the people who took the samples apologised for their mistake.Why did he test positive, then? Was that ever explained?
Dillian Whyte Tested Positive For Two Dianabol Metabolites
https://www.boxingscene.com/dillian-...olites--141198
The people who have ALL the information know more than some random bloke who read a story on the internet and thinks he knows it all.Comment
-
What mistake did they make that they had to apologize for? And do you have any sources you could point to that will back up this argument?Comment
-
AJ is the most recognised boxer in the world. Fury was just the first of the bunch allowed to fight by Wilders team.
Any of them would have beaten Wilder as he is a fake paper champ pansy.
Look at what you have;
Washington, Martin, Hunter, Ruiz who considers himself Mexican and a broken fake champion.
Whyte could beat the lot of them and he's our number 3.
They are maybe on the Huey Fury/David Price level at best, a pathetic bunch who would barely sc**** into the top ten UK heavyweights.Last edited by Angeljuice; 05-27-2020, 03:16 AM.Comment
-
I don't have to back up anything, there is no argument, he was acquitted of any wrongdoing. The "argument" is just in the heads of those that can't deal with reality.
I'm sure you'll find it with a Google search, I'm not interested in a finished, dead and buried argument.Comment
-
I see. So no sources to explain anything.I don't have to back up anything, there is no argument, he was acquitted of any wrongdoing. The "argument" is just in the heads of those that can't deal with reality.
I'm sure you'll find it with a Google search, I'm not interested in a finished, dead and buried argument.
We are just supposed to accept that UKAD acquitted him and that's that, without asking any questions.Comment
-
Your whole case rests on Boxingscene alleging that there was a problem with his UKAD sample and yet you won't accept it when UKAD say they ****ed up and there was no doping offence?
You want to believe a journalist reporting hearsay and not listen to the UK Anti Doping agency after they had fully investigated and basically apologised? What about when Boxingscene posted that there was no case to answer when the evidence had actually been looked at? Do you believe that story or just the false one that suits your agenda?Last edited by Counterleft; 05-27-2020, 04:26 AM.Comment
-
Comment
Comment