Comments Thread For: Shawn Porter: I Would Rather Have Had Pacquiao's Career Than Mayweather's

[pasawayako]

A warrior who got his ass handed to him so many times. I’d rather be the other guy.

You have the same mentality of floyd who likes to be called a coward than to fight a prime pac.

[pasawayako]

I think most of floyd fans are also coward just like their idol floyd. LMAO.

[pasawayako]

pac himself isn't unlikeable, but his fans are such raging delusional idiots, that it makes it hard to root for him. It brings more joy to know his idiot fan base weeps uncontrollably with every loss than it ever does to watch him win.

I actually like floyd when he isn't a coward but when he become a rich coward (he actually admitted in the video) that's the time i despised him, he pick the safest and no threat opponent upto to the end of his careee. Macgegor, berto, tenshin.

[Bronx2245]

Porter trying to get that Pacquiao fight! LMAO! If he wants to be like Pacquiao, then call out Jermell Charlo! The greatness of Pacquiao is all those belts, in all those weight classes! If Shawn wants that, then don't talk about it, be about!

[Lomadeaux]

Actually wanting to have a loss on your record is pretty confusing to me.

[Lomadeaux]

I actually like floyd when he isn't a coward

How many undefeated champions did he face?

[Monty Fisto]

They're both gonna be hall of famers, so picking one over the other isn't casting aspersions at the one you don't pick. It's just a preference. They've both had great careers. Mayweather did great things. Pac did great things. Porter even says Mayweather did great things for the sport that aren't appreciated as much as they should be. That doesn't sound like he's crapping on Floyd. Just answering the question, that his preference is toward the more fan-friendly style of Pac.

[Jab jab boom]

I actually like floyd when he isn't a coward but when he become a rich coward (he actually admitted in the video) that's the time i despised him, he pick the safest and no threat opponent upto to the end of his careee. Macgegor, berto, tenshin.

so just to be clear, Floyd facing a younger version of Oscar at 154 wasn't a threat, so then he was even less of a threat when pac faced him a year and a half later at 147, right? Floyd facing Cotto at 154 wasn't a threat, so he definitely wasn't a threat when pac faced him at 145, right? Floyd facing an undefeated Hatton wasn't a threat, so he definitely shouldn't have been a threat for pac 2 yrs later since he was already ko'd by Floyd, right? Floyd facing Marquez wasn't a threat, even though he schooled him 3 yrs before he knocked pac out? So he shouldn't have been a threat to pac either then. Floyd facing a 23 yr old Canelo when he was 36 wasn't a threat, so then we can safely say that pac fighting guys like ríos, algieri and vargas weren't true threats either. Right? Just want to make sure that we're being consistent.

[MulaKO]

They're both gonna be hall of famers, so picking one over the other isn't casting aspersions at the one you don't pick. It's just a preference. They've both had great careers. Mayweather did great things. Pac did great things. Porter even says Mayweather did great things for the sport that aren't appreciated as much as they should be. That doesn't sound like he's crapping on Floyd. Just answering the question, that his preference is toward the more fan-friendly style of Pac.

Unfortunately haters are going to hate
They all have an agenda

[Goldie]

They're both gonna be hall of famers, so picking one over the other isn't casting aspersions at the one you don't pick. It's just a preference. They've both had great careers. Mayweather did great things. Pac did great things. Porter even says Mayweather did great things for the sport that aren't appreciated as much as they should be. That doesn't sound like he's crapping on Floyd. Just answering the question, that his preference is toward the more fan-friendly style of Pac.

Porter’s preference is his preference and he’s the only who has to underrating it. It’s a ****** preference in my opinion that’s based on some kind of ulterior motives because may had clearly had a better career than pacquiao just on the facts alone. He went undefeated, made more money, and took less punishment. There’s no objectionable logical reasoning for why one would prefer manny’s career other than personal bias. Again tho, whatever his reasoning is, that’s his reasoning.

What you said in bold makes no sense tho. How can pacquiao be more “fan friendly” when more fans tuned in to watch floyd than to watch him? Even against their common opponents more people paid to watch Floyd. Floyd consistently drew more fans than pacquiao.