-
-
What is don’t get us why do posters like you and time and others trash GGG (rightfully so) for his high risk low reward fights but when it comes to floyd and Conelo they earned it
Nobody earns sh it bro: you are in the game to fight the best prove you are best no matter what. It’s a sh it load of double standards from all fan bases
Y’all need to learn to call a spade a spade
I’ll rock with GGG long after he retires but I’ll call him out on his bs tooComment
-
ward is a cheater protected by refs and judges, no need to "fight" himComment
-
your search for conformation bias continues! i love how you setup a fake argument based on max loving ggg. max loves ward. listen to him do some of his fights. he even pretended ward won the first kovalve fight and that there werent low blows in the second. max is going on the same wrong information as you are mr. castellanos. ward made an offer but it was not a legit offer. we know that now. ggg was never postponing the canelo/cotto fight for a year to fight ward the next year. wards own team admitted they thought ggg was available to fight in 2015 yet they only offered to fight him in 2016. absurdComment
-
you have it badly twisted
not sure why
Mayweather and Canelo fought the best repeatedly, and have little/no genuine misses...
keyword = " genuine "... so, no point in talking shlt
Golovkin willingly fought the best once, in his cash-out fight...
other than that, they have nothing in common... Mayweather and Canelo are CLEARLY cut from a different cloth than Golovkin
you had no business whatsoever mentioning Golovkin alongside PROVEN fighters
we still don't know if Golovkin could have beaten... Charlo, Andrade, Saunders, Cotto, Lara... but we know that Canelo can
stop comparing proven fighters... with a guy who REFUSED to prove himselfComment
-
-
and of course, we got a load of shlt from daggum, as usual...
"According to Yormark, Roc Nation was never afforded the opportunity to discuss weight, the financial terms, potential dates, which fighter was the A-side or any other factor - because their offer was turned down in 36 minutes.
"I respect Tom and he's a nice man, but as it relates to this issue - he's way off-base," Yormark told BoxingScene.com. "The chatter that you've been hearing from Triple G's camp is inappropriate, inaccurate and we need to clear this up immediately."
"Andre Ward has always fought the best opponents that were available, and that holds true today as well. We want to fight the best and we obviously consider Triple G a formidable opponent. We made an offer to fight Triple G. It was the number one priority on Andre's list."
"We made him an offer, prior quite frankly, to knowing about the fight with Lemieux. But regardless of that fight, the offer was very, very clear - that he and Andre would both have one fight before they fought each other, and they would fight each other sometime in the first half of 2016. So obviously the fight with Lemieux would continue to move forward and the next fight would be Andre in 2016.
"They received the offer and in 36 minutes we got a response which basically stated 'we cannot accept the offer and we're going in a different direction.' In 36 minutes [they turned it down], so that tells me there was not even any consideration given to the offer, because at the end of the day Triple G always knew that he would never fight Andre Ward. He's stated publically, and in writing, that he would go up to 168 to fight anybody but Andre. We put an official offer on the table and we got a 'no' in 36 minutes.
"I think you can assume that a fight between Triple G and Andre Ward is a fight that people would love to see. It would be great for HBO. I think, for the most part, everyone was on board - with the exception of Triple G and his camp. How do you respond in 36 minutes with a 'no' - unless you had no intention of fighting Andre Ward.
"The only way you respond in 36 minutes is if you had no intention of ever fighting this guy. That's what 36 minutes tells you. Because if they did had a desire to fight Andre, and get in there with one of the best fighters in the world, they would have responded with 'thank you for your offer, we're going to discuss this with our fighter and get back to you.' That's typically how it's done. You don't respond in 36 minutes."
"The split would have been a secondary issue behind making the fight and having a desire in making the fight. If they had responded to the email and said 'listen, let's sit down, let's negotiate and let's see if we can come to terms' - then that's a different story. We didn't have the opportunity to talk a split, we didn't have the opportunity to talk about who was the B or the A-side. We didn't have the opportunity talk about any details. To come out and say who would be the A-side and talk about splits, the reality was - they said 'no' in 36 minutes."
"Right now, Andre Ward is the best pound-for-pound fighter in the world and they don't want nothing to do with him. I don't care what weight it is, I don't care what city it is, I don't care what country they fight in - they don't want nothing to do with the best pound-for-pound fighter in the world. That's not on their agenda. They can continue to fight journeymen and protect his record and try to continue to build this invincibility aura that he currently has. The fight with Andre Ward would have bee the fight to prove to people if he's as good as people think."
I am sorry you feel that Bullshltkin's " urgent " business with Wade and Brook somehow took precedent over Ward lol
btw, the deal you somehow describe as " absurd "... is the exact same deal they struck with KovalevComment
Tweet
Comment