How come some people like 3G can keep a title they are given but not won they win?

[DreamFighter]

observing -GGG for instance was able to defend a fake title for years and years without a problem, but once he won a recognised title in the ring, he could only last three opponents before surrendering it.
How come hes crap at defending a title he wins but good hes given a fake one?

[TheMyspaceDayz]

You sound like a GGG knockout victim if we are being honest.

[DreamFighter]

You sound like a GGG knockout victim if we are being honest.

true, I am about the level of boxer as one of GGG's bum defences, well said.

u sound like a person with multiple personality disorder if I (not we) am honest, but i am not complaining.

[Citizen Koba]

Dudes will literally come up with anything.

[Blond Beast]

observing -GGG for instance was able to defend a fake title for years and years without a problem, but once he won a recognised title in the ring, he could only last three opponents before surrendering it.
How come hes crap at defending a title he wins but good hes given a fake one?

So people u can write corny posts like this. U tell me why he’s crap? Are u pretending u haven’t formulated ur own opinion? Why are u talking like it’s some sort of conspiracy? Ur just saying GGG is crap, that’s fine. But why write like ur confused and u need someone else to set u straight? All u want to hear is that ggg sucks. That’s fine. Just say in ur opinion ggg defended a fake title for years and then lost a real one after three defences, and then u tell us why that is? I mean u said u observed GGG so why are u asking for an explanation from other people? Do u think magic or voodoo was involved? Yeah ur either trolling or pandering, both are poor forms of writing. Just come out and say ur opinion and back it up the best u can. Why pretend ur a moron? Ur calling one ( or several ) titles fake, and another one real. So if that’s ur opinion, why do u need to ask why a “real title” is harder to defend than a “fake title?” U have no idea? Just say ur piece about someone and back it up. U can trash ggg without trashing yourself.

[Thuglife Nelo]

Dudes will literally come up with anything.

But u been ducking my PAC thread when you enjoy analytical debates regarding PEDS. Remember when I said most GGG Fans stem from PAC... coincidence?

[TheMyspaceDayz]

true, I am about the level of boxer as one of GGG's bum defences, well said.

u sound like a person with multiple personality disorder if I (not we) am honest, but i am not complaining.

Ok, so you’re being honest. That means that ‘we’ are collectively being honest.

That lesson is free. You pay for the next one.

[Citizen Koba]

But u been ducking my PAC thread when you enjoy analytical debates regarding PEDS. Remember when I said most GGG Fans stem from PAC... coincidence?

Ducking? I never even looked at it... and I was never a major Pac fan anyway, same as with Floyd. Why would I, every time I look over stuff like that it turns out to be a pointless waste of time, just the Pac / Floyd weirdos continuing their ridiculous feud.

Best I've always understood the accusations from both sides there it was always just speculation and unproven accusations. Has there been some new breaking news or are will still on circumstantial ish? You know me man, I like to deal with actual evidence rather than speculation.

Are you saying you believe it's worth my time? There's something substantive in there or is it just treading over the same accusation and counter accusation? As I said with Canelo unless there's some new facts emerged it probably just needs to be left to lie.

You want my opinion I think there's every chance Pac was juicing for at least part of his career and IV gate looks real bad for Floyd too, but I honestly ain't looked into to either enough to give a real informed opion and I don't really care enough to now, that ish is ancient history, man.

[Thuglife Nelo]

Ducking? I never even looked at it... and I was never a major Pac fan anyway, same as with Floyd. Why would I, every time I look over stuff like that it turns out to be a pointless waste of time, just the Pac / Floyd weirdos continuing their ridiculous...

I don’t care about Floyd’s IVgate theory.

Why I care about is why didn’t Pac vs Thurman have VADA testing if it’s the Golden Standard for major boxing events today?

The question is why did Pacquiao say that giving blood weakens a fighter? He even said it’s not good to give blood during training since it “inhibits”... what athlete says this kind of stuff!? Imagine if Olympians said this? Would it mean that all Olympians really aren’t 100% or would say they aren’t 100% for doing advanced drug testing?

[Citizen Koba]

I don’t care about Floyd’s IV hate theory.

Why I’m care about is why didn’t Pac vs Thurman have VADA testing if it’s the Golden Standard for major boxing events today?

The question is why did Pacquiao say that giving blood weakens a fighter? He even said it’s not good to give blood during training since it “inhibits”... what athlete says this kind of stuff!? Imagine if Olympians said this? Would it mean that all Olympians really aren’t 100% or would say they aren’t 100% for doing advanced drug testing?

Aha. Recent?... I just had a vague memory of seeing a thread about Pac in 2010 or something and thought you were talking about that.

Far as I can see it there's no good reason why any top level fighter shouldn't have testing written into their fight contracts or that any fighter should avoid testing or be non-compliant. When that happens I'll always harbour su****isions as to why. What I won't do in any case is declare guilt based on circumstantial evidence.

As to why Pacquiao said this or that I have no idea, but he isn't the sharpest tool in the shed for sure, in fact most fighters ain't, and hearing dumb crap come out of the mouth of a boxer ain't exactly unusual.