Wilder is not even a very good win for Fury

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • W1LL
    Celtic Warrior
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Dec 2004
    • 11851
    • 845
    • 916
    • 71,119

    #21
    Originally posted by JakeTheBoxer
    When Fury closes this Wilder chapter, he should fight Joshua to prove how good he really is.
    Very much a ******ed logic. When Tyson Fury outclasses and batters Anthony Joshua, people will just say the same things about AJ that you are now saying about Deontay Wilder. Dumb.

    Fury toyed with the most dangerous man in the division, and battered him. Nobody but Tyson could make it look so easy. Wilder still has a very good chance of beating the majority of other Heavyweights, just not the Gypsy King.

    Comment

    • removed
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Nov 2008
      • 21479
      • 4,005
      • 831
      • 164,542

      #22
      I think there's a very good chance that Wilder shatters AJ's glass jaw all over the ring, there's a reason why AJ ducked him after all.

      Comment

      • TMLT87
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Jan 2020
        • 6302
        • 1,851
        • 917
        • 27,292

        #23
        Wilder might be very one dimensional, and I dont think hes the 2nd (or maybe even 3rd) best of the current HW crop, but in some ways he was the biggest stylistic threat to Fury. Because he nullifies a lot of Furys usual height/reach advantage and he has massive ATG level one punch power that carries throughout the fight. Theres better more well rounded technical boxers out there than Wilder, but I wouldnt favour any of them to actually outbox Fury, and none of them have Wilders hail Mary shot to fall back on.

        Comment

        • VG_Addict
          king meat's twin
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Jun 2012
          • 5618
          • 237
          • 3
          • 53,380

          #24
          Originally posted by The D3vil
          Dude, Holmes beat Ray Mercer 7 years after he lost to Spinks. A Mercer who got robbed against Lennox Lewis and gave Evander Holyfield hell.

          The only time Larry Holmes looked bad was against Mike Tyson, a guy you swear is overrated and he continued to fight for another 12 years after Tyson beat him, never being KO'd again.

          Michael Spinks' victories over Holmes are absolutely legitimate.

          I swear you gotta be like 15.
          Spinks would be way too small to compete in today's HW division. He was what, 200 pounds in the first Holmes fight?
          Last edited by VG_Addict; 05-17-2020, 10:00 AM.

          Comment

          • The D3vil
            WBA/WBC/WBO/IBF/Lineal
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Mar 2016
            • 6371
            • 1,634
            • 1,439
            • 56,286

            #25
            Originally posted by BangEM
            Shut up.

            Spinks was a blown up middleweight. He's not beating anyone in the top-5 in this era.
            He had been heavyweight champ for 3 years.

            With your logic, James Toney was a blown up middleweight.

            Floyd Mayweather's a blown up junior lightweight.

            Manny Pacquiao's a blown up flyweight.

            Like seriously, Spinks ended the 2nd longest reign in HW history against a top 5 HW of all-time. GTFOH

            He'd beat Dillian Whyte, Joseph Parker, & wouldn't let that morbidly obese slob Andy Ruiz knock him out like your boy did.

            Comment

            • The D3vil
              WBA/WBC/WBO/IBF/Lineal
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Mar 2016
              • 6371
              • 1,634
              • 1,439
              • 56,286

              #26
              Originally posted by VG_Addict
              Spinks would be way too small to compete in today's HW division. He was what, 200 pounds in the first Holmes fight?
              Michael Spinks frame wise is about the same size as Ollie Usyk.

              You act like he wouldn't be able to just put on an extra 10lbs. or something

              Comment

              • BodyBagz
                The Stuff Of Nightmares
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Apr 2020
                • 29772
                • 6,045
                • 6,437
                • 108,454

                #27
                Fury's best win was vs an uninterested Wlad. It was a terrible fight where it seemed no one wanted to win. Remove Wlad and what's left

                Comment

                • Tyistall
                  Banned
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Mar 2017
                  • 1872
                  • 97
                  • 0
                  • 48,057

                  #28
                  Before the rematch, Wilder (according to you guys) was the hardest hitting heavyweight ever. I always knew he was a bum beating fraud who would get exposed as soon as he tried to step up competition. Now we see him for what he is. But now after the fight, Fury, who was always a boxer and not a puncher, is somehow this amazing knockout artist who batters everything in sight hahah. He's not. If that were the case, he would have KOed Wallin with ease. Take away Klitschko and Wilder from his resume. What is left? A bunch of bums, gatekeepers and average boxers. Many of which, Fury looked bad against. Fury is a pretty good boxer but you guys have gone waaaaay overboard saying he's unbeatable. Not one title defense and a shotty resume doesn't make you unbeatable. Plus, and I will bring it up every single time, he has a steroids history. And I'm very sure that he didn't just "jump up" to being 273 and strong without help hahahha

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  TOP