Comments Thread For: ESPN Broadcast Team Vehemently Opposed To Remote Judging

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MulaKO
    Zero F@cks Given
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Oct 2007
    • 26896
    • 6,760
    • 6,070
    • 221,421

    #11
    Has the WBC really gone full re tard
    IMO , you can’t Fugain judge a fight properly without being ringside
    Funny though how some judges , even being ringside , can get the scores totally wrong
    I think there would be even more screw ups being at a remote location lol

    Comment

    • PittyPat
      Kin yer taste the blood?!
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Jan 2009
      • 11210
      • 709
      • 444
      • 28,773

      #12
      This'll work...

      Comment

      • Lomadeaux
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Jan 2017
        • 7657
        • 848
        • 120
        • 133,607

        #13
        Originally posted by angkag
        Its worked so well in the past lol.
        It doesn't work in a lot of cases because people who shouldn't be around boxing are.

        Comment

        • chaosisme
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Apr 2013
          • 1348
          • 156
          • 88
          • 25,686

          #14
          I remember people on this forum and elsewhere in the boxing world clamoring for remote judging for years. Now that it's actually proposed, everyone throws a hissy fit LOL. However, this isn't about stamping out corrupt scorecards.

          Comment

          • Squared.Circle
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Feb 2020
            • 1208
            • 88
            • 43
            • 31,803

            #15
            Originally posted by xxlefthookxx
            Best idea in some time. This gives all of the judges the same angle (like in diving, gymnastics, etc.). It allows for QUALITY CONTROL. It eliminates the built in excuses for judges seeing it from a different angle. If there is a divergent scorecard (ahem..118-110 ms byrd...) then those judges can be excused from the occupation. If they are all such good judges, then they should be able to score the fight identically from identical vantage points. I have pushed this for years.
            I’ve been saying the same for years too. Lock each judge in a separate back room with a member from the commission and sanctioning body and allow them to have access to instant playback and different camera angles. They’ll have a much better vantage point than being ringside, they won’t be influenced by the crowd and they'll have the ability to go back between rounds and double check anything they were unsure of from a different angle.

            I guarantee Fury would be certified 2–0 over Wilder, instead of just by overwhelming consensus.

            Comment

            • xxlefthookxx
              Contender
              Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
              • Nov 2016
              • 155
              • 6
              • 0
              • 14,569

              #16
              Originally posted by Squared.Circle
              I’ve been saying the same for years too. Lock each judge in a separate back room with a member from the commission and sanctioning body and allow them to have access to instant playback and different camera angles. They’ll have a much better vantage point than being ringside, they won’t be influenced by the crowd and they'll have the ability to go back between rounds and double check anything they were unsure of from a different angle.

              I guarantee Fury would be certified 2–0 over Wilder, instead of just by overwhelming consensus.
              At least we will get two votes for it. Boxing has for far too long allowed this built-in excuse to allow a judge or two to be disconnected from reality. Also in my opinion, the judges need to see the same fight as the fans on TV. That lends credibility to the result, rather than trying to defend byrd, cj ross, etc.

              Comment

              • Dasmius Shinobi
                Zenobia
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Aug 2017
                • 2984
                • 160
                • 295
                • 74,570

                #17
                This is going to create more problems.

                Hell's no to this remote judging. Is sufficient the way the judges, judge fight and this come with more problems than fixes. Judges need something to block the fans and commentator sounds and voices. The only sound I want the judges to hear are the boxers.

                Comment

                • The D3vil
                  WBA/WBC/WBO/IBF/Lineal
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Mar 2016
                  • 6309
                  • 1,608
                  • 1,407
                  • 56,286

                  #18
                  Originally posted by xxlefthookxx
                  Best idea in some time. This gives all of the judges the same angle (like in diving, gymnastics, etc.). It allows for QUALITY CONTROL. It eliminates the built in excuses for judges seeing it from a different angle. If there is a divergent scorecard (ahem..118-110 ms byrd...) then those judges can be excused from the occupation. If they are all such good judges, then they should be able to score the fight identically from identical vantage points. I have pushed this for years.
                  Originally posted by xxlefthookxx
                  At least we will get two votes for it. Boxing has for far too long allowed this built-in excuse to allow a judge or two to be disconnected from reality. Also in my opinion, the judges need to see the same fight as the fans on TV. That lends credibility to the result, rather than trying to defend byrd, cj ross, etc.
                  [IMG]https://media.*****.com/media/60rViqulI88L2yomaR/*****.gif[/IMG]

                  Comment

                  • TheMyspaceDayz
                    Banned
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Dec 2019
                    • 5837
                    • 900
                    • 623
                    • 189,135

                    #19
                    Anyone see those DAZN streams where Hearn breaks down Joshua - Ruiz while he’s rewatching it or De La Hoya breaking down his fight with Gatti?

                    Make it so when a judge hands in a questionable scorecard, they are sat in a room and forced to do a similar round by round breakdown for everyone to see. This idea is genius.

                    Comment

                    • MulaKO
                      Zero F@cks Given
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Oct 2007
                      • 26896
                      • 6,760
                      • 6,070
                      • 221,421

                      #20
                      Originally posted by TheMyspaceDayz
                      Anyone see those DAZN streams where Hearn breaks down Joshua - Ruiz while he’s rewatching it or De La Hoya breaking down his fight with Gatti?

                      Make it so when a judge hands in a questionable scorecard, they are sat in a room and forced to do a similar round by round breakdown for everyone to see. This idea is genius.

                      This I totally agree with
                      Judges should be held responsible for what scorecards they hand in
                      Not only so but also be held responsible to explain their cards as soon as the fight is over , especially when almost all feel something is up
                      This would save the bullchit threads we see over and over about the likes of Pac vs Floyd etc etc etc
                      It might sound like we are throwing the judges under the bus but I would be willing to believe that Adelaide Byrd would not hand in such cards much to hard to explain
                      It’s easy for the judge to hand in their scorecard but to explain it , that’s another matter

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP