Comments Thread For: Porter: Still Light In That Tunnel For Those Who Want Me To Fight Crawford

[MexicanStyle#1]

Apparently you forgot that time Brook came across the pond and took Porter's IBF belt.

True!!! Make the rematch then

[Combat Talk Radio]

True!!! Make the rematch then

Literally no value to Porter. Brook is far beyond damaged.

[Mister Wolf]

Brook and Porter are nice fallback plans if he cant get the Pac fight.

[Bronx2245]

Porter said a lot, without saying anything at all! C'mon Bob, this is the best opponent out there, besides Manny Pacquiao, and I think he fights Mikey! Crawford vs. Porter! Make It Happen!

[toff]

Porter is a legitimate threat, never ko'd, he has fought the best, I like Crawford but who has he fought. This is a good fight and will finally allow us to compare Crawford with a top WW

[H.B.Viper]

Solid . You just

"Porter hopes Crawford will at least consider it."

Which is another way of saying that Crawford is the one who ducked it, and all the "Porter don't want it" cats on NSB just got smoked.

"Porter has no belt!" yet talking about facing Brook who is way more damaged and has no belt.

"Porter does nothing for Crawford's legacy!" yet Bes***** is being considered.

"Shawn didn't say he wanted it!" he just did.

"Crawford wants Spence!"

He just cut an interview saying he wants Spence to do a get back first before fighting him.

Your boy Crawford is smoke and mirrors. Every excuse has now been debunked.

Became my friend.
Been saying that about Crawford for the longest time.
We don't know if he can take a punch from the "real welters ", & not TR /WBO ranked fighters. .

[ShoulderRoll]

Porter can’t beat Crawford. I know you are high on Porter because he exceeded your expectations vs Spence but he performed to my expectations. Porter or Brook, doesn’t really matter. I’d much prefer that we move closer to undisputed which neither fight does without a belt. I’d rather Crawford move up to 154 and fight Charlo than waste his time further at 147.

Porter is a big, strong welterweight. He absolutely has a chance versus Crawford.

Which is exactly why Crawford is not interested and is pursuing Kell Brook instead.

[Combat Talk Radio]

Became my friend.
Been saying that about Crawford for the longest time.
We don't know if he can take a punch from the "real welters ", & not TR /WBO ranked fighters. .

Everyone around here know I've been calling it out for months. Certain people remain in denial.

Even when I posted Crawford on DAZN specifically ducking Porter, they still were in denial.

[John Locke]

Porters level? What level is Shawn Porter? Lmao, Porter is equal to Jeff Horn.

Any WW that has a draw with Julio Diaz shouldnt be bragged about being on "a level."

And this is serious, this isnt the normal joking around i do.

He drew with Diaz when he was coming up lol, he's had plenty of fights since and beaten better fighters than Diaz. Hardly something to hold onto. I'm gonna assume you're trolling again tho, cba

[Boxfan83]

Come on man.

First of all, you're using a 8-year old fight (that was avenged) to explain why Porter doesn't deserve a fight now, but in the SAME breath call out 8-year old accolades for Crawford.

Let's make this easy and talk about the last 3 years for both guys, and answer ONE question for both.

Which guy has fought quality opponents? Threats? Risks?

An 8 yo fight that wrote the textbook on how to beat him. Rewatch the diaz fight and the brook fight.

If u think Crawford cant do what Brook and an old LW can do than I really dont know what to say.