Comments Thread For: Porter: Still Light In That Tunnel For Those Who Want Me To Fight Crawford
Collapse
-
-
Well, well. That ladies and gentlemen is a "call out" by Porter ... to a guy who is a friend but still an opponent in the same business - boxing. That's as respectable a call-out as Porter could make it. So no more "Porter don't want it" nonsense.
As far as Bud Crawford fighting Kell Brook ... Porter at this time is the better opponent. No one knows what Brook can bring at WW anymore, or even if he can be his old self at that weight (sad for Brook). If Brook could show up at that weight, and be his old self, Crawford might be in trouble. That's a lot of if's though.
Porter is still a force at welterweight, particularly when motivated by fear of a loss, as he was vs. Spence. If the Porter that fought Spence shows up, it will be lights out Bud. If the same Porter that fought Ugas shows up, Crawford will win. It's really that simple.
For Crawford (who I like and who may be the best WW one day), like it or not, he is still very unproven at WW. The best thing he could do for his WW career is get in there and win a fight vs Porter.Comment
-
Porter vs Crawford
That fight will not happen so don't hold your breath. Crawford will not agree to it because he knows he can not handle the pressure and the heat that Porter consistently brings. Crawford and his team talk a real good game.Comment
-
U dont get resume points for losses. The DSG fight is a gold star for Porter BUT many people including myself thought Ugas beat him.
Crawford knocked out his last 4 and 3 were undefeated. But i can scratch off Khan, thats like beating beating granados.Comment
-
So you're saying - you rate a guy who gets in and sparks B and C levels over a guy who gets in there and damn near beats A-levels every time.
That's what you're saying? Here in front of everyone? I just want to make sure it's on record.
Because you realize why Crawford is undefeated and Porter is not, right?Comment
-
To be fair, he already fought Brook and lost but that was pre GGG.Comment
Comment