Comments Thread For: Crawford: Facing Spence In His First Fight Back Lose-Lose Situation For Me

[NachoMan]

This guy Crawford is burying his career more and more in the dirt. Aside from Canelo he’s probably one of the pickiest fighters I’ve seen and the difference between him and Canelo is that Canelo’s resume is not thin like Crawford’s.

Crawford making all these demands and excuses and hasn’t done anything at all. Best wins are Horn,Postol and Khan

Yeah, big TC fan, but same thoughts here.

[NachoMan]

I'm a huge fan of Bud as a boxer but after he made those ignorant comments about COVID-19, it would appear he's not that bright outside the ring. He may be right about fighting Spence next but his prime time is a wastin' and with this virus, who knows when Bud v Truth will ever happen. Bud could very well be 34 or 35! That wouldn't be good for anyone. They need to fight by early to mid 2021 before Bud is past his prime.

Except that he is 100% right about COVID-19. Stop being a hysterical mush-head.

[NachoMan]

Crawford - "all of the PBC fighters are ducking me, I want all the big names"


Also Crawford - "fighting Spence would be lose-lose, is a bad idea"

Also Crawford - "Im not interested in fighting Porter, we used to be friens"


Future Crawford - "My opponent Kell Brook is a tough fighter and a win over him proves Im the best"

Yeah, he's killing his own PBC blacklist argument.

[NachoMan]

I disagree Terence, you cop two belts, there is gain. Who cares what the haters got to say? They havent approved of you anyway, in spite your notable list of accomplishments in the sport of boxing, which in my opinion reflect a exceptional talent.

Considering the treacherous politics in this game, you got to make the fight when you can. Dont wait, time is not on your side.

For sure. Bud is making the rookie mistake of thinking that he's going to actually please folks who already don't like him. This is a huge fight no matter the context. What if Spence takes a tune-up fight and loses badly to a B-level guy? TC misses out on the payday, the belts and the legacy win. There is then no point at all in fighting Spence, ever. Stop overthinking things, Terrence. Call Spence out now and make it happen. There is still plenty of sorting out to do in this division and you are approaching your mid-30's.

[HarvardBlue]

Bud forgot to finish his “lose-lose” argument. If he “lost” to Spence, people would say he got beat by a guy coming off a bad car accident.

Might be a sign of doubt creeping in his mind.

[ShoulderRoll]

But fighting Kell Brook would be a win-win situation right?

Top Rank Protection Program in full effect.

[Combat Talk Radio]

Crawford - "all of the PBC fighters are ducking me, I want all the big names"


Also Crawford - "fighting Spence would be lose-lose, is a bad idea"

Also Crawford - "Im not interested in fighting Porter, we used to be friens"


Future Crawford - "My opponent Kell Brook is a tough fighter and a win over him proves Im the best"

This was Crawford almost the same day Spence got in a wreck:

[HewJohnson]

He’s right.
And you can blame all the fa66otz on this website who try to discredit a win over Spence due to his accident.

Fa66ot posters like the trolls here complain when they’re favorite boxers lose so they make excuses.

They already making excuses for Spence losing before he even has a fight set up. Lmao.

[Tbone27]

I don't understand why everyone is calling for Crawford to fight Porter. Porter has no belt and he lost to Thurman, Brook, Spence, and got a gift vs Ugas so a win over him wouldn't prove much. Crawford should target Manny, Thurman, Danny Garcia, Teixeira, and Brook, in that order

[ShoulderRoll]

I don't understand why everyone is calling for Crawford to fight Porter. Porter has no belt and he lost to Thurman, Brook, Spence, and got a gift vs Ugas so a win over him wouldn't prove much. Crawford should target Manny, Thurman, Danny Garcia, Teixeira, and Brook, in that order

BoMac, is that you?

Brook has no belt either and is damaged goods.

Porter is a far better option.