I am actually disappointed that he didn't quit.
All these years I thought Boxers were supposed to quit.
Wilder quit against Fury.
Whitaker quit against crossing the street.
Tyson quit at life.
Ali quit against Holmes.
Robinson quit against Maxim.
Harry Wills backhanded Sharkey to get out of their fight.
Peter Jackson quit against young Jim Crobett .
You see, for well over a century, any time a good fighter didn't have things go his way, he just quit.
What is different about Lomachenko? What could it possibly be that sets him apart from these other Boxers? I am sitting here scratching my head wondering why he fought on like a man. Why could possibly have had the self-respect and dignity to endure that pain and not reduce himself to the level of an animal, like Salido... or these famous fighters above. Dammit what is different about Lomachenko!?!?
All these years I thought Boxers were supposed to quit.
Wilder quit against Fury.
Whitaker quit against crossing the street.
Tyson quit at life.
Ali quit against Holmes.
Robinson quit against Maxim.
Harry Wills backhanded Sharkey to get out of their fight.
Peter Jackson quit against young Jim Crobett .
You see, for well over a century, any time a good fighter didn't have things go his way, he just quit.
What is different about Lomachenko? What could it possibly be that sets him apart from these other Boxers? I am sitting here scratching my head wondering why he fought on like a man. Why could possibly have had the self-respect and dignity to endure that pain and not reduce himself to the level of an animal, like Salido... or these famous fighters above. Dammit what is different about Lomachenko!?!?
Comment