Comments Thread For: Warren: Tyson Fury Glove Allegations Are Pathetic, It's ******!

[SugarRaRobinson]

Fury is coming under so much heat with his shady gloves that he's now giving credence to Wilder's costume excuse. LMAO
Let's not forget that this is the same excuse all the Fury followers laughed at. So the question now becomes, will Fury fans now start giving credence to this story now as well ?

He must really be getting desperate.

https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/boxing/tyson-fury-admits-deontay-wilder-21825452

[Squared.Circle]

Ive never claimed to have all the answers (who,what,where,when, why and how). Nor do I have all the answers to your silly questions like "How does Fury pull his pants up" lol . Nor do I care. What I do care about is how does a guy with such a declarated history of cheating and millions of dollars get such a lousy defense team ? (speaking of u and Nacho Daddy of course).

As we both know, circumstantial evidence gets it right sometimes, and wrong sometimes. But is NOT always directly related to the case in question. Drew Peterson initially got away with murdering his 3rd wife as they ruled it a accidental tub drowning, despite bruising suggesting a struggle insued. But once his 4th wife disappeared they reopened the case of the 3rd wife to nail him since they couldn't find the body of the 4th wife.

And guess what ? Everytime he went to court he had some paid counsel by his side who I'm sure was trying to henge the whole case on some silly azz "Plausible Deniability" arguments like;

"If he strangled her in the tub, then how'd he pull is pants up" ?

Nevertheless, Fury is being tried in the court of public opinion right now, and I promise u his guilt or innocence won't henge on silly "plausible deniability" arguments like "how did he pull his pants up" ?

Furthermore, the word "conspiracy"
usually denotes many people involved. And no I don't believe getting some rigged gloves to the ring would be as complicated as you made it sound with all sorts of agencies collaborating together on it for it to actually be successful. So regardless of how many times u post the textbook definition of "conspiracy", it's still wrong if your not giving it proper context.

So if I'm pulling at straws, they are straws that Tyson constantly gave all of us to pull on. So u can either pull on them, or constantly keep denying the straws exist at all.

So what you’re basically saying is, you ignore and dismiss everything logical that disputes the conspiracy theory because it goes against your point of view? Lol conspiracy theorist 101 right there. You’re bringing up the terribly flawed American judicial system again, but it doesn’t lend anything to your cause. Peterson’s ex wife had a shoddy post mortem, they reopened the case, found found evidence to suggest foul play was afoot, not drowning. Murder. His next wife is suspected to have been murdered. Both wives, both murdered. That’s the circumstantial evidence. Not that he shot his previous wife in the foot so he must have murdered the last wife. Both wives, both murder. So, Fury had stitching (shot in the foot) on his glove (the wives) torn so he must have somehow dislodged his hand (murder). They both pertain to gloves (wives) but the method is completely different. They’re not one in the same. It’s not evidence, circumstantial or not. You literally have no argument with the “circumstantial evidence like in a court of law” lol that is now dead.

Getting tampered gloves to the ring wouldn’t be as complicated as what? The athletic commission delivering the gloves to Fury, checking them before they hand them over, watching them be fitted, laced and taped, checking them again, staying in the changing room the entire time, escorting him to the ring, the referee then checking the gloves in the ring, and the gloves then being handed to the athletic commission for examination immediately after they're removed? Lol yea that wouldn’t be complicated at all.

Plausible deniability? You made a big deal about circumstantial evidence...the fact that Fury can grip and pull things with a part of the glove which apparently has no hand in it is...*drum roll*...circumstantial evidence. Very decisive circumstantial evidence as it happens. Said circumstantial evidence tips the scale of reasonable doubt in Fury’s favour. Or, does that circumstantial evidence not count because it again goes against your point of view? Lol conspiracy theorist mentality again.

I’m not denying there’s no straws to clutch at. “Clutching at straws” literally means you’re trying to find any excuse or reasoning because logic isn’t in your favour. So no, quite the opposite. I say said straws are there a plenty.

This make believe “court of public opinion”...if you haven’t noticed, not only on this forum but also in the boxing world, Fury has been deemed innocent by the majority. It’s a minority that are spouting this nonsense even in the face of logical answers that people seem to be unable to dispute. As you like to jabber on and make comparisons to the court system, what happens when a jury comes back with a majority of not guilty in most cases? Exactly. So by your standards, it’s case closed lol

Conspiracy theory through and through.

It’s alright, chap, I used to believe in the whole “bombs in the twin towers” and “I have samples of nano thermite I collected from the debris”...until I did what you refuse to do, objectively look at and listen to the other side of things.

This is twice we’ve had a back and forth over this nonsense. It’s a solid 2-0 in my favour, undoubtedly lol Your points fell to pieces and now you’ve resorted to rhetoric. Just give up already lol logic prevails. All hail The Gypsy King.

[Squared.Circle]

Nah. I’m not in Wilders corner. If anything I’m in boxing’s corner. I’ve seen the vids and pics from the first fight. Any unbiased fan can see it looks fishy af. Warren is not unbiased, so you cannot put any weight on what he says.

And you can’t put any weight on what the racist, unbiased Wildettes who made those initial videos say. I mean...it’s gone from...Fury removed the padding out of his glove, then when reminded that’s literally impossible to get away with in this day and age, it changed to...he somehow dislodged his hand from the glove. I’ve seen the same pictures and videos, but I’m presuming unlike you, I then went and watched the videos that totally debunk it. The scales are so unfairly balanced in Fury’s favour that it is actually ridiculous people are burying their head in the sand and continuing to perpetuate this desperate nonsense lol

[Squared.Circle]

Fury is coming under so much heat with his shady gloves that he's now giving credence to Wilder's costume excuse. LMAO
Let's not forget that this is the same excuse all the Fury followers laughed at. So the question now becomes, will Fury fans now start giving credence to this story now as well ?

He must really be getting desperate.

https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/boxin...ilder-21825452

Did you actually read that article? He didn’t give credence to it lol he said “maybe” about five times, while also listed a few other excuses. He also said “I don’t know but...”

This is just like Fury saying “you almost knocked me spark out with one of those punches”...even though literally at no point in the fight was Fury even close to being knocked out. He’s trying to ease his pain.

Who’s he coming under heat from? Wilder fangirls making divy videos and commenting in forums? Lol behave.

Dude is bipolar. He’ll be back to slating Wilder and calling him a spaghetti leg dosser tomorrow.

[pollywog]

There's not enough heat on Fury to light a decent fart.

I just don't see how, if your hand is taped up into a solid fist and jammed into a glove that only accommodates a fist shape, it is possible to maneuver said fist into a lower position on the glove.

Is there any footage anywhere of anyone recreating a taped up fist in a glove and showing how they can slide it down into such a position as to be able to biatchslap windmill like Fury did?

That's like reaching round the s-bend on your dunny trying to retrieve a turd that's long gone

Dont tell me, show me!

The glove conspiracy, that is, not some windmill fangirl handling pooh retrieved from his crapper.

[MoneyKasha]

this conspiracy was a racist LDBC agenda since day 1

anyone that dismisses that is lying out their a**

[solo20]

I'm shocked that nobody else realized the dude's gloves would literally flop behind his own wrist. Have you seen that NORMAL in any typical boxing match? NO! You can hate all you want, but that was not in any way normal. I don't know what they want to come up with as to why that happened, but something wasn't right.

I feel like the combination between Wilder wearing a dumbass costume and Fury's hacked gloves resulted in the destruction of Wilder.

I know the Fury lovers are going to hate on this post but listen, I liked the guy up until this whack crap. If there is one thing I hate, it's gaining leverage to get an advantage/win in a fight. You cannot deny something was up.

If you are a true boxing fan and can honestly believe that gloves fold nearly behind the guys own wrists, you aren't true. Did you ever see that happening in Israel Vasquez vs Rafael Marquez??? HELL F**KIN NO. Real men, real balls.

what a surprise is Pac fan know for making every excuse in the book every time Manny got his ass kicked

[MoneyKasha]

this is the logical mind behind this whole conspiracy

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3RaXNTIjQhk

let that sink in, and maybe some of you proponents for this ******ity might reconsider your position

[pollywog]

this is the logical mind behind this whole conspiracy

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3RaXNTIjQhk

let that sink in, and maybe some of you proponents for this ******ity might reconsider your position

Essential late night viewing for locked down crackheads.

The ol nation of islam mother ship connection, half human, half hybrid, fully ******!

[SugarRaRobinson]

So what you’re basically saying is, you ignore and dismiss everything logical that disputes the conspiracy theory because it goes against your point of view? Lol conspiracy theorist 101 right there. You’re bringing up the terribly flawed American judicial system again, but it doesn’t lend anything to your cause. Peterson’s ex wife had a shoddy post mortem, they reopened the case, found found evidence to suggest foul play was afoot, not drowning. Murder. His next wife is suspected to have been murdered. Both wives, both murdered. That’s the circumstantial evidence. Not that he shot his previous wife in the foot so he must have murdered the last wife. Both wives, both murder. So, Fury had stitching (shot in the foot) on his glove (the wives) torn so he must have somehow dislodged his hand (murder). They both pertain to gloves (wives) but the method is completely different. They’re not one in the same. It’s not evidence, circumstantial or not. You literally have no argument with the “circumstantial evidence like in a court of law” lol that is now dead.

Getting tampered gloves to the ring wouldn’t be as complicated as what? The athletic commission delivering the gloves to Fury, checking them before they hand them over, watching them be fitted, laced and taped, checking them again, staying in the changing room the entire time, escorting him to the ring, the referee then checking the gloves in the ring, and the gloves then being handed to the athletic commission for examination immediately after they're removed? Lol yea that wouldn’t be complicated at all.

Plausible deniability? You made a big deal about circumstantial evidence...the fact that Fury can grip and pull things with a part of the glove which apparently has no hand in it is...*drum roll*...circumstantial evidence. Very decisive circumstantial evidence as it happens. Said circumstantial evidence tips the scale of reasonable doubt in Fury’s favour. Or, does that circumstantial evidence not count because it again goes against your point of view? Lol conspiracy theorist mentality again.

I’m not denying there’s no straws to clutch at. “Clutching at straws” literally means you’re trying to find any excuse or reasoning because logic isn’t in your favour. So no, quite the opposite. I say said straws are there a plenty.

This make believe “court of public opinion”...if you haven’t noticed, not only on this forum but also in the boxing world, Fury has been deemed innocent by the majority. It’s a minority that are spouting this nonsense even in the face of logical answers that people seem to be unable to dispute. As you like to jabber on and make comparisons to the court system, what happens when a jury comes back with a majority of not guilty in most cases? Exactly. So by your standards, it’s case closed lol

Conspiracy theory through and through.

It’s alright, chap, I used to believe in the whole “bombs in the twin towers” and “I have samples of nano thermite I collected from the debris”...until I did what you refuse to do, objectively look at and listen to the other side of things.

This is twice we’ve had a back and forth over this nonsense. It’s a solid 2-0 in my favour, undoubtedly lol Your points fell to pieces and now you’ve resorted to rhetoric. Just give up already lol logic prevails. All hail The Gypsy King.

No, actually what I'm saying is that NO logical person would actually even attempt to conjure up such a plethora of "Plausible Deniability" excuses for every single one of Fury's improprieties. And for the unmpteen time, when someone has a defrauding "Body of Work" , it no longer qualifies as a conspiracy theory when people see what appears to be him adding to his legacy of transgressions.

What the *** is so hard to understand about that ????

So while your trying to conviently narrow the convo down to 1 incident (Hammer fight glove incident). What I was saying earlier was that it doesn't matter if he was innocent in that 1 incident, because the probability of him being innocent in all the rest is HIGHLY UNLIKELY.

U got the sparring partner identifying tampered gloves BEFORE the 1st fight. Then u got the jilted farmer who said Tyson stiffed him and paid him to lie. Then u have past ******* use. Then u have gloves flapping in the wind during the first fight. So from a neutral party or prospective who will appear to be the fool ? Would it be me who is looking at the tainted body of work and concludes that this guy is dirty.
Or you looks at the same body of work and exonerates him every time with 1 silly plausible deniability excuse after another ?

Lastly what u said about the Peterson trail doesn't matter because he would of NEVER been retried for murdering the 3rd wife had the 4th never disappeared. So obviously and circumstantially he was retried based on his past, as was O.J. in his Vegas case.

So if u believe your 2-0, it's only because it's your score card. And we all know if it's your score card, it's probably as crooked as Fury's reputation. My suggestion, give up, u got bodied and resurrections only occur in the Bible.

If u decide to respond I probably won't to avoid redundacy as we've been over the same sh.t for quite some time now and it's really as simple as u believe everything Fury says, and I don't.