Just watched. He presents his case pretty poor. I watched until about 8 mins in. That picture at that point is where he sees things that is debatable. What he says is fury’s palm looks to me to be the fingers just below the wrapped fist. What he says is Tyson’s wrist, looks to me to be his thumb.
Tell me if he has conclusive evidence in the ladder part of the vid before I dismiss it as bias Brit batty gypo propaganda?
Edit: Another thing. He goes at length into explaining that it was 2 different types of gloves in the 2 fights. He may be correct, but maybe he should have said that it APPEARS to two different types of everlasting gloves. It is well known that boxers tend to favorite one type of gloves, but that there may be marketing interests that dictates them to use another type and/or brand. That often gets done with having the preferred glove stamped with the paying sponsors stamp. I don’t think the glove type is particularly relevant though.
Tell me if he has conclusive evidence in the ladder part of the vid before I dismiss it as bias Brit batty gypo propaganda?
Edit: Another thing. He goes at length into explaining that it was 2 different types of gloves in the 2 fights. He may be correct, but maybe he should have said that it APPEARS to two different types of everlasting gloves. It is well known that boxers tend to favorite one type of gloves, but that there may be marketing interests that dictates them to use another type and/or brand. That often gets done with having the preferred glove stamped with the paying sponsors stamp. I don’t think the glove type is particularly relevant though.
Comment