Why did Canelo pick the one light heavyweight with multiple losses and KO defeats who was 36 years old instead of anyone of the 3 other younger light heavyweight champions who were all undefeated?????? Why did he drop his WBO 175 pound world title belt he just won from Kovalev like a hot rock immediately after winning it?????? That is not the normal way things are done, Normally when a boxer wins a new world title they stay there and defend it. The truth is Canelo beat the weakest 168 pound champion in Fielding and never defended that title and beat the weakest light heavyweight champion and never defended that title either. Canelo was a 15 to 1 betting favorite to beat Fielding and a 5 to 1 favorite to beat Kovalev so the pro odds makers didn't think he was taking that much risk in those fights. The betting places have made Canelo a 2 to 1 favorite to beat old GGG so they consider that fight a much bigger risk for Canelo than his fights at 168 and 175.
So a MIDDLEWEIGHT is called a CHERRYPICKER for fighting a consensus Top 3-5 LIGHT HEAVYWEIGHT?????????!?
?!!?!??!?!?!?!?!
No. You are Borat ****** trash
Why did Borat fight Vanes, Rolls (at CW 164), and Wade??? When he COULD HAVE fought...Andrade, Dervenchenko, Charlo, BJS, Ward at 168 (who Borat called out), Canelo/Cotto (at CW), Lara, Kell Brook at 157 CW, and Borat also REFUSED rematches with Jacobs (deserved) and BORAT LOST TO DERVENCHENKO....
Why did Canelo pick the one light heavyweight with multiple losses and KO defeats who was 36 years old instead of anyone of the 3 other younger light heavyweight champions who were all undefeated?????? Why did he drop his WBO 175 pound world title belt he just won from Kovalev like a hot rock immediately after winning it?????? That is not the normal way things are done, Normally when a boxer wins a new world title they stay there and defend it. The truth is Canelo beat the weakest 168 pound champion in Fielding and never defended that title and beat the weakest light heavyweight champion and never defended that title either. Canelo was a 15 to 1 betting favorite to beat Fielding and a 5 to 1 favorite to beat Kovalev so the pro odds makers didn't think he was taking that much risk in those fights. The betting places have made Canelo a 2 to 1 favorite to beat old GGG so they consider that fight a much bigger risk for Canelo than his fights at 168 and 175.
In what fkn world does a MW cherry pick a LHW CHAMP ranked P4P top 20 at the time??? And ranked almost EVERYWHERE #1 or 2???
I feel sorry for your dad. He has a fkn RTARD for a son. He probably even calls you ****** while your wife cheats on you. You have no F’n CLUE
Wrap your head around this...so called fans accuse a MIDDLEWEIGHT of "CHERRYPICKING" a LIGHT HEAVYWEIGHT. And that particular LHW is likely going into the HOF.
#BoratWorld
Kovalev was 5-2. Keep telling yourself Ward won the 1st fight.. Breadman lmfao
You Borat stans are legitimately insane. Wouldnt be surprised if yall are killing your dogs during this pandemic like yall did in 2012 during the rapture.
Lmfaoooo
A fighter is considered a HOF fighter by the work he did in his PRIME years.
Sure Kovalev WAS a top guy but when he fought Alvarez he was a shell of what he once was.
Why is that so hard to understand?
A fighter is considered a HOF fighter by the work he did in his PRIME years.
Sure Kovalev WAS a top guy but when he fought Alvarez he was a shell of what he once was.
Why is that so hard to understand?
Sure I agree, but you and your rabid butthole lickers blame a MIDDLEWEIGHT for CHERRYPICKING a HOF LIGHT HEAVYWEIGHT.
You deny facts, and you dodged the point. What would've been the point for Bivol, Gvozdyk or Beterbiev to fight Kovalev? The answer is unification and boxing?!
You're just trying to discredit Canelo while fumbling on your own agenda.
LMAO. You proved my point on the deflection as well, Canelo own GGG diehards. The debate is about criticism for GGG. Are LHW debates a remedy to sway away from GGG debates?
So you're argument is Kovalev wasn't a shot fighter and a weak champ because if the other top guys at 175 fought him it would have been for"...unification or boxing"? That makes no sense at all.
Kovalev would have been an underdog no matter what.
What do you mean by criticism for Golovkin? What are you criticizing him for?
If I knew WTF you were talking about I might try to answer but you"re writing is mostly incomprehensible.
Comment