Thoughts on Sweet Pea vs GGG

[Boxing_1013]

Don’t bother bud, the guy clearly has an agenda, he literally compared Azumah Nelson to Jacobs, Lemieux and Murray.😂

Exactly this... this guy clearly doesn’t know his history. His original comparison was decent but his lack of knowledge has been completely exposed.

Lol...man I must have struck a nerve with you somewhere...you're still here, for no reason at all lol, and trying to be catty like a woman...it's embarrassing.

I really can't imagine how in your head you feel like you 'won' or 'proved' anything here lol...but if that helps ya, please feel free to feel that way my (probably) 55 year old friend.

If you want to over-rate some guys/wins from that era and downplay similar ones from this era...feel free, doesn't bother me bud...in the future I hope you will react a little better when someone challenges your points...you have kind of shown your as.s here in this thread, and when all someone does is get nasty on here with no substance, it really sets a nasty tone for the whole thread, and I have no interest in that in my threads.

I'm on here to talk boxing and occasionally I find some good posts on here from some of the gents here...if I hurt your feelings along the way, I do apologize again...hope you have a great day bud.

[RJJ-94-02=GOAT]

Lol...man I must have struck a nerve with you somewhere...you're still here, for no reason at all lol, and trying to be catty like a woman...it's embarrassing.

I really can't imagine how in your head you feel like you 'won' or 'proved' anything here lol...but if that helps ya, please feel free to feel that way my (probably) 55 year old friend.

If you want to over-rate some guys/wins from that era and downplay similar ones from this era...feel free, doesn't bother me bud...in the future I hope you will react a little better when someone challenges your points...you have kind of shown your as.s here in this thread, and when all someone does is get nasty on here with no substance, it really sets a nasty tone for the whole thread, and I have no interest in that in my threads.

I'm on here to talk boxing and occasionally I find some good posts on here from some of the gents here...if I hurt your feelings along the way, I do apologize again...hope you have a great day bud.

So you’ve struck a nerve with me yet you’re the one who keeps quoting me. It’s evidently the other way round. Once again grade A delusional logic.

I ain’t reading these delusional essays...

Clown...

[Boxing_1013]

So you’ve struck a nerve with me yet you’re the one who keeps quoting me. It’s evidently the other way round. Once again grade A delusional logic.

I ain’t reading these delusional essays...

Clown...

? dude you're in my thread...quoting me...you're a weird guy man, no offense

[RJJ-94-02=GOAT]

I’m not quoting you. I’m replying to other posters who actually have genuine opinions who are also trying to educate you on Sweet Pea, Nelson etc. I’m telling them not to bother because you clearly have this pathetic agenda.

Clown...

[RJJ-94-02=GOAT]

Don’t bother bud, the guy clearly has an agenda, he literally compared Azumah Nelson to Jacobs, Lemieux and Murray.��

Exactly this... this guy clearly doesn’t know his history. His original comparison was decent but his lack of knowledge has been completely exposed.

Case and point...

Neither of these messages were to you and you felt the need to quote them with essay like responses.

Whose feelings are hurt again?

What a clown...��

Corrected it for you buddy. Since it means so much to you.

[Boxing_1013]

I’m not quoting you. I’m replying to their posters who actually have genuine opinions who are also trying to educate you on Sweet Pea, Nelson etc. I’m telling them not to bother because you clearly have this pathetic agenda.

Clown...

Yeah those last 2 guys had good posts...disagreed with what I said, and I disagreed with some of their points...but we had a mature brief discussion and disagreed without getting nasty...that's how adults should do it.

And dude...you're in my thread...quoting me, directly or indirectly...I think most would say it's pretty cowardly to talk about someone indirectly, and then on top of that, to get mad when that guy calls you out on it lol...like how old are you, it's pathetic lol.

You're seemingly getting super emotional and name-calling just because someone doesn't agree with a (rather poor imo) opinion you have on here...like why do you care so much lol.

I would say the guy who gets upset that someone else won't agree with him is the one who has the agenda bro...not me.

Have a great day

[Boxing_1013]

Case and point...

Neither of these messages were to you and you felt the need to quote them with essay like responses.

Who’s feelings are hurt again?

What a clown...��

It's whose* btw

What kind of man talks about another man behind his back/indirectly...and then gets upset when that guy responds - with words - to him?

You're a coward dude lol...this is hilarious...keep digging though, it's great.

[RJJ-94-02=GOAT]

Who is or who’s is perfectly acceptable. Try harder next time.

“Whose” quoting who again? Just let it go and stop getting in your feelings about it.

Looking forward to seeing Danny Jacobs, Martin Murray and David Lemieux join Azumah Nelson in the HOF one day.

Trolls like you don’t deserve a quoted reply...

[RJJ-94-02=GOAT]

www.enhancemywriting.com/whos-vs-whose

Hopefully you’ve at least learnt something today.

Clown...

[Boxing_1013]

Who is or who’s is perfectly acceptable. Try harder next time.

“Whose” quoting who again? Just let it go and stop getting in your feelings about it.

Looking forward to seeing Danny Jacobs, Martin Murray and David Lemieux join Azumah Nelson in the HOF one day.

Trolls like you don’t deserve a quoted reply...

www.enhancemywriting.com/whos-vs-whose

Hopefully you’ve at least learnt something today.

Clown...

Lol OK now I just think you're trolling man...so thanks for that...because you can't be serious.

You said 'who's feelings are hurt'...you use 'who's' when it is a substitute for 'who is' (who has)...you have to use 'who's and whose' correctly man lol...you don't just use them interchangeably...the correct one there would be 'whose.'

Above...you said 'whose' quoting who lol...that one should be 'who's' ...as in, 'who is' quoting who again lol...this is hilarious man I love it...if you're trolling you should keep it up...if you're being serious, you should really stop.