Comments Thread For: Mayweather: Crawford is Pound-For-Pound Best in Boxing!

[rednael@charter]

Crawford The Best?

Granted, Crawford is undefeated and can claim the mythical title of Pound for Pound best. Until he meets Spence and / or decides to face Porter (a fight he totally turned down) , he is Top Ten, but not Pound for Pound best. Right now, that title belongs to Canelo Alvaarez.

[Goldie]

Say it again in English. Google translate would do a better translation translating from ancient coptic dialect spoken in the least visited village in Egypt's history into English than you express yourself.

Lol at the effort.
I suspect you broke a sweat writing this post.

[MxcoFistology]

Jeff Horn DID beat Manny.

Lmao yea keep believing that, just like tim Bradley "did" beat Pacquiao in that first fight lol

[techliam]

I disagree

The Welterweight division is too poor for Crawford to catch up to Canelo

It’s full of names but lacking in elite talent

[KillaMane26]

I disagree

The Welterweight division is too poor for Crawford to catch up to Canelo

It’s full of names but lacking in elite talent

If Crawford beats Spence he is #1. Canelo beating cherrypicking Sergey is enough to have him at #1 right now but not good enough once\If the other top 5 p4p guys beat other p4p guys

[hugh grant]

I don't know who has the best resume currently. Well, I know who I think it is and its not Crawford. Crawford isn't no1 pfp. But if for instance Pac was to beat him, some Pac critics might even have the audacity to say its not a great win for Pac as who did Crawford beat type line of argument? Or in Floyds fans case it would be something like why should Floyd fight Crawford, who has Crawford beat?
But even though Crawford isn't pfp no1, of course if you was to beat him, you would get credit for beating one of the most talented in the sport.

[techliam]

If Crawford beats Spence he is #1. Canelo beating cherrypicking Sergey is enough to have him at #1 right now but not good enough once\If the other top 5 p4p guys beat other p4p guys

Brook was fairly matched with Spence until another eye injury

The Porter fight was razor thin

I just don’t rate Spence that highly

The only Welterweight to really separate himself from the rest of them is Pacquiao, and he’s far removed from his peak and is practically a part-time boxer. Yes he’s a legend of the sport, but these younger guys shouldn’t be so far behind at this stage

Says a lot in my opinion

[KillaMane26]

Brook was fairly matched with Spence until another eye injury

The Porter fight was razor thin

I just don’t rate Spence that highly

The only Welterweight to really separate himself from the rest of them is Pacquiao, and he’s far removed from his peak and is practically a part-time boxer. Yes he’s a legend of the sport, but these younger guys shouldn’t be so far behind at this stage

Says a lot in my opinion

But Brook gave GGG work at 160
And Porter gives everyone tough fights. You underrating both guys.... Regardless Spence has been p4p for a while. A win over another p4p guy holds weight especially an undefeated p4p guy

[techliam]

But Brook gave GGG work at 160
And Porter gives everyone tough fights. You underrating both guys.... Regardless Spence has been p4p for a while. A win over another p4p guy holds weight especially an undefeated p4p guy

Brook was brutalised by Golovkin. He had a lot of success initially but was broken down and stopped

Porter gives that level of fighter tough fights. Thurman, Garcia, Spence - all 4 can split decision each other until the rest of time.

Pacquiao has shown he beats that level of fighter at this advanced age.

I don’t think it’s underrating at all. The divisional hype overrates them if anything, but they have no elite wins between them apart from eachother

[KillaMane26]

Brook was brutalised by Golovkin. He had a lot of success initially but was broken down and stopped

Porter gives that level of fighter tough fights. Thurman, Garcia, Spence - all 4 can split decision each other until the rest of time.

Pacquiao has shown he beats that level of fighter at this advanced age.

I don’t think it’s underrating at all. The divisional hype overrates them if anything, but they have no elite wins between them apart from eachother

I agree with the last part..... But Pac beating Thurman sets him apart but not by much since the fight was close and Thurman came off a 2year layoff. The Porter that fought Spence beats the version of Thurman Manny beat imo.

But as i was saying regardless of our opinions Crawford and Spence both p4p a win over one another holds alot of weight and since Crawford is top 3 that type of win automatically bumps him to #1.

But question who u thinks wins 2019 Porter vs 2019 Thurman?