Comments Thread For: Mayweather: Crawford is Pound-For-Pound Best in Boxing!

[j.razor]

No hes not, floyd. His biigest wins are a washed up over the hill amir khan, a overrated jeff horn whose only big win was a robbery against manny pacquiao and a very small midget gamboa. Aint nothing p4p about that record . Just because he says he is and bob arum says it doesnt mean its true .

Jeff Horn DID beat Manny.

[MulaKO]

Jeff Horn DID beat Manny.

Hahahahahahahahahahaha

[Tlows1]

Yeah right.. lmbao

Bud is going to let that go to his head...WATCH

[GhostofDempsey]

Further proof that Floyd has no intention of putting Tank in with Loma. If he did, he would have been smart and said Loma was P4P #1, that way, if Tank loses he just lose to the best fighter in boxing and if he wins he just defeated the best boxer P4P. This is also his passive-aggressive way at throwing shade at Spence.

[IceTrayDaGang]

Jeff Horn DID beat Manny.

makes floyd's win over manny seems less important anymore then. got damm jeffery horn! ruining floyd's legacy!

[MulaKO]

makes floyd's win over manny seems less important anymore then. got damm jeffery horn! ruining floyd's legacy!

Exactly
Kind of like Fury being mentioned that he’s an atg but only after he beat Wilder , which those same people call a bum

Just can’t have it both ways

[El_Mero]

PBC/Haymon are pis.sed because of this statement! FMJ just sh.it all over their welterweights. Hopefully/maybe this helps to get the Craf/Spence fight made......wont hold my breath though

[NachoMan]

Most people know this whether they want to admit it or not.

Big TC fan, but even I know that his resume doesn't put him at the top. He's the most skilled, most talented, whatever, but competition faced and competition beaten has to be the top criterion for deciding P4P status, right? People can argue back and forth about the P4P, but, for everyone's sanity, they really must indicate what criteria they are basing their picks on.

[hugh grant]

Crawford isn't the pfp best fighter. The boxer with the best resume should be considered the best otherwise its smoke and mirrors. Similar to when Pac was beating all the Mexicans, Pac should have been no1 pfp but wasn't even though pac had the best resume.
If you make the person with the best resume no1 it makes life easier and simplifys things. It need not be brain science to choose pfp no1.
It allow Crawford to continue to duck challenges as hes considered no1 pfp without needing to take a challenge? How does it benefit anyone making a guy with rubbish resume no1 pfp?

[lowblows420]

Who gives a fk what Mayweather the p4p pu55y thinks this mofo retired and still ducking and cherry picking fkng cowards ass ngga