What constitutes a close decision vs Wide decision?

[ReggieKray]

He didn't look like crap but he didn't do anything spectacular or push to end it. He'll always look like that at 147 unless he's fighting a pie cause he gives up too much size. I don't know why he insists on fighting at welterweight, he's not a dynamic fighter like a Pacquiao who had intangibles that would negate the size he gave up

I mean kudos to him for daring to be great, but after two fights it is proof enough that he can't compete at the highest levels of that division. He went from trying to fight the best and losing miserably to fighting an exhibition fight with a barley contender and got whooped most of the fight.

The whole goal is to win a belt in that division and right now I can't see him getting anywhere close to that dream.

[GGG Gloveking]

You are studying law yes?

Can you represent me on the pick-em league?

I picked Garcia Dec Wide X 3
And mother***ing these bush league, noob ass game runner decided the verdict should be
Close decision in favor of Garcia.

How the *** is this a close decision? Lol.

This is the most fervent NSB legal representation I can give you. We don't have a prima facie case because of their 12 pt rule. Try to find other instances of bias, bad scorecards, or other substantive reason that this one judge's card should not be counted. (Maybe he has an Adalaide Byrd card out there somewhere). We can motion the Pick-Em Court of Appeals to have the judge's card suppressed, which would cause the remaining cards to be tabulated on a pro rata basis, giving you the requisite points.

[4truth]

There was only one good scorecard. I felt like the other 2 were influenced to make sure the right man won.

but yes, strictly speaking, right or wrong, the "decision" was not close.