35% to Pulev but Wilder was getting offered 30%?
Pulev getting 35% from Joshua fight...
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Not to mention that I'm sure Hearn and Joshua wanted to slide that rematch clause in there, since mandatories defenses don't come with that clause.I think a number of posters forget that when you are the mandatory challenger you do have leverage you can use, especially if you have a promoter with deep pockets on your side. Pulev did exactly what he should've-either pay me what I want or we do this the hard way and you risk either fighting off dazn (which he;d never do) or give up the belt, which he doesn't want to do.Comment
-
Comment
-
No because the size of the fight with Pulev is still less then a Wilder fight in 2018 ,it wouldn’t matter you guys are acting like casuals not knowing this information .
Parker was given 33% or so and he raked in about 7 million .
The casual explanation to you. HaComment
-
FACT: they offered Parker, and Pulev, a reasonable split... because they actually wanted to fight Parker, and Pulev...
FACT: they lowballed Wilder $12m, and $15m, respectively... because they did not want to fight ******* ******
fill in the blanks dumbassComment
-
They don't get it. Just like they don't understand why Wilder wouldn't want to sign a multi fight deal with a streaming service hoping he might get Joshua at the end.Comment
-
guess you forgot the part where they offered him 100 million which is far more than both parker and pulev are getting.it was 40 million for each joshua fight which is far more than they are getting and far more than wilder made fighting fury, ortiz, and breazele. how do you explain that? he literally lost tens of millions of dollars. what did you want joshua to do? 200 million? remember wilder was making like 1 million dollars at the time of this offer but keep revising history and pretending it was a lowball. wilder only made the big money after joshuas offer. coincidence? usually people parlay offers into getting more money...wilder the dunce did the opposite and parlayed it into less money! cong****! and you are defending the ducker. cong****!
Comment
Comment