I'd pick Fury over any HW in history
Collapse
-
Do you expect Fury to stand in the middle of the ring and let Wilder knock him out?Comment
-
Tyson Fury has beaten a extremely limited, possibly the most limited WBC Heavyweight champion in history of the sport 'A limited big puncher, who cannot win rounds' I give credit for Fury winning, and being the first man brave enough to roll the dice against Wilder 'But in comparison to Muhammad Ali's win over Foreman HIS win is not as great 'Foreman was a big puncher who was not limited, possibly the strongest/most durable heavyweight of all time 'And he could also win rounds etc'
Deontay Wilder is probably the most limited big puncher in the history of the sport, his punches have no power when smothered 'And he struggles to do anything creatively, and looks like a novice' SOMEBODY on this site mentioned that they wanted Tyson Fury to win for the sake of the sweet science because? It was embarrassing how Wilder's power was just canceling out and hiding all of his flaws.
As Antonio Tarver has recently just stated 'Wilder really needs to start from the bottom again and build his foundation'.
People will ride this wave high, that is the nature of culture in today's society 'I am made up Tyson Fury won, but I am keeping things in perspective'.
Note: I was neutral on the fight, but I did state that Fury was going to fight the way he did etcLast edited by PRINCEKOOL; 02-27-2020, 07:03 AM.Comment
-
You idiots can't on one hand call Wilder unskilled and on the other hand say Fury is the greatest for beating this unskilled opponent? it don't add up. fact is this is literally the worst era of heavyweights in boxing history. a fighter like Razor Ruddock would be a world champion today.Comment
-
You idiots can't on one hand call Wilder unskilled and on the other hand say Fury is the greatest for beating this unskilled opponent? it don't add up. fact is this is literally the worst era of heavyweights in boxing history. a fighter like Razor Ruddock would be a world champion today.
Oh, and Fury would've smashed Razor to bits!Comment
-
lol don't try to credit Wilder now just because Fury won. 5 year reign and who did he beat?? all you Fury fans been tarnishing Wilder as a fighter for how he swings and also diminishing his resume. but now you must change the narrative to lift Fury higher in your mind. Fury would not smash any heavyweight from the 90's "to bits". none. We are living in the weakest era of heavyweights ever. Ken Norton would be undisputed today.Comment
-
lol don't try to credit Wilder now just because Fury won. 5 year reign and who did he beat?? all you Fury fans been tarnishing Wilder as a fighter for how he swings and also diminishing his resume. but now you must change the narrative to lift Fury higher in your mind. Fury would not smash any heavyweight from the 90's "to bits". none. We are living in the weakest era of heavyweights ever. Ken Norton would be undisputed today.
You don't know anything about boxing so excuse me if I don't take your opinion seriously.
I'm just telling you the facts. Deal with it.Comment
-
Comment
-
He took a page out of Steward's playbook against Wilder, that's the smother/lean/hold style that he taught to Wlad & Lewis. It makes you nearly unbeatable, you become a master of distance & it zaps your opponents legs while you expend very little energy. I thought I'd never see this style again but he brought it back against Wilder. I think this is peak Fury and I'd favor him over anybody in the history of the sport.Comment
Comment