Comments Thread For: Wallin: My Fight With Fury Should've Been Stopped On Cuts

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Vinnykin
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Feb 2016
    • 5150
    • 200
    • 118
    • 78,217

    #41
    Originally posted by deathofaclown
    What a ****** thing to say.

    It wasn’t stopped and Fury won, so it was the right decision because Fury was able to fight on.

    Of course we have seen fights stopped with cuts like that. But we’ve also seen bull***** stoppages when fighters get dropped, it doesn’t make it the right decision. So next time any fighter get’s dropped, we can refer to a past bad stoppage and say “well he should’ve been stopped by the ref” because it happened before. It doesn’t work that way.

    For me, it just shows a weak mentality of fighters when they look for a victory in a situation that they don’t control, i.e looking for a ref or doctor to stop the fight.

    If you’re good enough to win, you’ll do it on your own terms, not on a judgement of a doctor.
    Agree 100%....... during the fight Fury said "I live for this shiat".....

    It was a nothing punch that cut Fury, and he out fought Wallin in a poor fight after that.

    End of.

    Comment

    • LoadedWraps
      Official NSB POTY 2016
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Nov 2010
      • 24197
      • 1,009
      • 1,464
      • 190,165

      #42
      Originally posted by Roberto Vasquez
      Wallin speaks the truth. If Fury fans want it their way - Fury beat Wilder and then lost to Wallin.
      A ******ed post.

      You can't argue Wallin beat Fury in any way. Outside of the cut, Fury beat him from pillar to post. If you want to cling to one punch as meaningful in a fight said fighter didn't do anything else in, then boxing isn't for you, go watch MMA and leave decision scoring debates to adults who know what they are talking about.

      Woulda coulda shoulda doesn't get you anything boyo. No one gives a damn whether you, or some other ref would have stopped the fight hypothetically. Hypotheticals have no weight here.

      Comment

      • Roberto Vasquez
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Jul 2013
        • 3996
        • 740
        • 139
        • 46,352

        #43
        Originally posted by LoadedWraps
        A ******ed post.

        You can't argue Wallin beat Fury in any way. Outside of the cut, Fury beat him from pillar to post. If you want to cling to one punch as meaningful in a fight said fighter didn't do anything else in, then boxing isn't for you, go watch MMA and leave decision scoring debates to adults who know what they are talking about.

        Woulda coulda shoulda doesn't get you anything boyo. No one gives a damn whether you, or some other ref would have stopped the fight hypothetically. Hypotheticals have no weight here.
        You made by point for me. That's exactly what I was arguing lol.

        People were saying Fury won the first fight - but he didn't. If they want to change that - they have to change the Cunningham result to a loss

        Comment

        Working...
        TOP