The Wilder vs Fury 2 undercard absolutely sucks

[dan_cov]

No real notable names on it but I think its full of good competitive fights.

Looks lackluster if just glancing over names/records but I think it requires a deeper look. Joe Santisima for example sure he hasn't fought anyone good and has 2 losses but he was like 16/17 in those fights, a mere boy. After watching a few of his fights Navarette might not want to look past him he looks quite dangerous albeit at a much lower level. This could well be a sleeper imo

He has no real head movement but there is a lot to like about Santisima.

[The Big Dunn]

Maybe some people do not want to support the boxing industry being run the way it has been by PBC/Top Rank?

By paying for this PPV people are saying to the promoters that it's ok to feed us that Wallin/Schwarz/Breazeale/Ortiz 2 crap for the last 15 months instead of giving us meaningful fights.

Dude, you paid for AJ/Ruiz, which was garbage, but was a huge upset. You are going to pay for AJ/Pulev, which is garbage as well.

You have no issue paying to see a fighter you like, regardless of who the opponent is. Don't get mad when other people do the same

[Ray*]

Yeah, I was thinking how Martin/Washington could turn out to be a war.

You would never know, yeah not great names on paper but that doesn’t mean it might not be a great fight.

[_Rexy_]

You would never know, yeah not great names on paper but that doesn’t mean it might not be a great fight.

Even “on paper” you can make an argument for “former world champion vs former title challenger.”

****, I should get my promoters license

[ramplamp]

The undercard is what made me decide not to order this pay-per-view. It's just disrespectfully terrible. This is probably the worst one I've ever seen, except for the Floyd/Manny undercard, which was highlighted by Leo Santa Cruz vs. a literal cab driver.

[ShoulderRoll]

Tell me the last 3 PPV undercards you loved? It's a PPV of course the undercard isn't fire.

PPV undercards are always ho hum. It's the exception going against the rule when there is a good one.

The Errol Spence vs Mikey Garcia undercard was decent, as was the undercard for Spence vs Porter.

There's no good reason why a paying boxing fan shouldn't expect more value for money.

Especially if PBC is involved since they certainly have the roster for it.

[ShoulderRoll]

No real notable names on it but I think its full of good competitive fights.

Looks lackluster if just glancing over names/records but I think it requires a deeper look. Joe Santisima for example sure he hasn't fought anyone good and has 2 losses but he was like 16/17 in those fights, a mere boy. After watching a few of his fights Navarette might not want to look past him he looks quite dangerous albeit at a much lower level. This could well be a sleeper imo

He has no real head movement but there is a lot to like about Santisima.

I bet you Navarrete runs right through him. Easy work.

This is like a pro wrestling squash match where a superstar beats a jobber like Iron Mike Sharpe or Barry Horowitz...except that the WWE would show those on free tv to entice people to buy a PPV.

In boxing they actually expect you to pay to watch the squash match.

[Randall Cunning]

Americans don't know how lucky they've got it. Us Brits have to be sat up til 4-5am watching that garbage undercard.

[ThatDude44]

Hopefully they're quick KOs to get us closer to the main event.

[Ray*]

Even “on paper” you can make an argument for “former world champion vs former title challenger.”

****, I should get my promoters license

That’s great for you. Great name doesn’t = Great fights, you should know that before getting your promoters license.