Alvarez Interested In 3rd Fight With GGG

[Boxing_1013]

Cmon bruh he’s the classic Pac/GGG converts and clownism. He’s saying judges don’t score defense in the 10 point must system. The idiot actually justifies defense as a criteria in his signature.

There is a channel called BDA Boxing. I literally heard a GGG fan saying he was sobbing and was sobbing on live air with the other panelists that he cried when GGG lost to Canelo. These are the types we’re replying to. Ill try and find that upload

I've never really been a Pac fan at all lol...he is a great fighter...but I'm not really a fan of anyone tbh...I just score fights and judge fighters accordingly...felt Pac lost to Horn...never really watched most of his other fights

[Boxing_1013]

I got you there didn’t I? You brought it on yourself. As long as Mike Tyson and Big George had Nelo beating Golovkin who cares about your theories and ringside observance tweets!

Again you’re not listening...

Effective Aggression – Being aggressive gives the impression of dominance, but unless the boxer is landing shots and not constantly getting countered, it’s not exactly “effective.” Judges look for effective aggression, where the aggressor consistently lands his punches and avoids those from his opponent.

Ring Generalship – The fighter who controls the action and enforces his will and style.

Defense – How well is a boxer slipping, parrying, and blocking punches? Good defense is important.

Clean and Effective Punches – To the untrained eye, it can appear as if a boxer is landing a lot of shots, when, in fact, most are being blocked or aren’t landing flush. A judge needs to look for hard shots that land clean

You're funny man...but yeah I don't really take you seriously on here, and you seem to be all over the place when trying to engage you in a real conversation.

[Thuglife Nelo]

I've never really been a Pac fan at all lol...he is a great fighter...but I'm not really a fan of anyone tbh...I just score fights and judge fighters accordingly...felt Pac lost to Horn...never really watched most of his other fights

As long as you love the sport is the only thing that matters. If you think GGG won then that’s your opinion. They were close competitive fights. But don’t talk nonsense not knowin the 4 Criteria for the 10PMS. You have Defense in your signature by a known judge. Surely you’re trolling... carry on

[Thuglife Nelo]

You're funny man...but yeah I don't really take you seriously on here, and you seem to be all over the place when trying to engage you in a real conversation.

You thinking the 4 Criteria is “funny” is like when Rodney Dangerfield told Joe Pesci in Easy Money, “What’s a matter with you...you laugh at weather reports...”

[UNBIASED BOXING]

As long as Mike Tyson and Big George had Nelo beating Golovkin who cares about your theories and ringside observance tweets!

Are you guys arguing about just the second fight, or the first? Not going through this entire thread

[Boxing_1013]

As long as you love the sport is the only thing that matters. If you think GGG won then that’s your opinion. They were close competitive fights. But don’t talk nonsense not knowin the 4 Criteria for the 10PMS. You have Defense in your signature by a known judge. Surely you’re trolling... carry on

You thinking the 4 Criteria is “funny” is like when Rodney Dangerfield told Joe Pesci in Easy Money, “What’s a matter with you...you laugh at weather reports...”

Defense is important my friend...as Weisfeld said...as it helps to set up your offense, and negates the opponent from scoring! So it is very important...and I would say vital usually, to have good defense...you just don't ACTIVELY score for defense my friend.

[Boxing_1013]

Are you guys arguing about just the second fight, or the first? Not going through this entire thread

Mainly the 2nd I guess...I said I felt GGG won all 3 of his fights with Jacobs and Canelo 8-4...and that SD was the real close/either way one of the bunch.

I think that is pretty clear but many on here seem to disagree...all I can say is if those guys all fought the other's fight in those fights...I would score all 8-4 against GGG, and then say the last one vs SD was close.

[boliodogs]

That would be great. GGG always deserved that rematch after such a close disputed loss in Canelo's boxing home town. Sure GGG has gone down hill like all boxers do at his age but better late than never.

[boliodogs]

I've never really been a Pac fan at all lol...he is a great fighter...but I'm not really a fan of anyone tbh...I just score fights and judge fighters accordingly...felt Pac lost to Horn...never really watched most of his other fights

Everybody has a right to their opinion. If you really think Horn deserved that home country robbery win over Pacquiao my opinion isthat is a really horrible wrong opinion. By count from neutral punch counters Pac landed twice as many punches as Horn. I know the punch stats can be wrong but not so wrong that the man they say landed twice as many punches lost the fight. Also Pac almost knocked Horn out in round 9 and Horn was allowed to fight an incredibly dirty fight that would have cost him points or a DQ anywhere else.

[boliodogs]

Golovkin should rematch Derev first. Maybe Jacobs. Both have claims they beat him.

Yes by all means make GGG at least 40 before fighting Prime young Canelo.